// Signature is valid, lets validate the claims for
	// other fields such as expiry etc.
	return claims.Valid()
}

// ParseUnverifiedStandardClaims - WARNING: Don't use this method unless you know what you're doing
//
// This method parses the token but doesn't validate the signature. It's only
// ever useful in cases where you know the signature is valid (because it has

  // database by the API server during CronJob validation and the controller manager during execution.
  // If no system-wide time zone database can be found a bundled version of the database is used instead.
  // If the time zone name becomes invalid during the lifetime of a CronJob or due to a change in host

field, [`Policies`](/pkg/crypto/x509/#Certificate.Policies), which supports
certificate policy OIDs with components larger than 31 bits. By default this
field is only used during parsing, when it is populated with policy OIDs, but
not used during marshaling. It can be used to marshal these larger OIDs, instead
of the existing PolicyIdentifiers field, by using the
[`x509usepolicies` setting.](/pkg/crypto/x509/#CreateCertificate).

version `RELEASE.2021-09-02T09-21-27Z` or older supports only a single remote target per bucket. To take advantage of multiple destination replication, use the latest version of `mc`

Status of delete marker replication can be viewed by doing a GET/HEAD on the object version - it will return a `X-Minio-Replication-DeleteMarker-Status` header and http response code of `405`. In the case of permanent deletes, if the delete replication is pending or failed to propagate to the target cluster,...

synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active replication caused by allowing delete markers set on a object version with `REPLICA` status back to source.

In the case of versioned deletes a.k.a permanent delete of a version by doing a `mc rm --version-id` on a object, replication implementation marks a object version permanently deleted as `PENDING` purge and deletes the version from source after syncing to the target and ensuring target version is deleted. The delete marker being...

                if (gradleInstallation == null) {
                    // Store the name without version as well, so we can look it up later
                    // See getNameOfJarReplacedByTestDistributionWithoutVersion why we are doing this
                    Optional<String> replacedPrefix = getNameOfJarReplacedByTestDistributionWithoutVersion(jarFileName);
                    replacedPrefix.ifPresent(prefix -> classpathJars.put(prefix, classpathFile));

		if base != t.base {
			return &Pointer{base: base}
		}

	case *Tuple:
		return subst.tuple(t)

	case *Signature:
		// Preserve the receiver: it is handled during *Interface and *Named type
		// substitution.
		//
		// Naively doing the substitution here can lead to an infinite recursion in
		// the case where the receiver is an interface. For example, consider the
		// following declaration:
		//

			cpuset.New(2),
		},
		{
			"allocate 4 full cores with 3 coming from the first NUMA node (filling it up) and 1 coming from the second NUMA node",
			topoDualSocketHT,
			mustParseCPUSet(t, "0-11"),
			8,
			"",
			mustParseCPUSet(t, "0,6,2,8,4,10,1,7"),
		},
		{
			"allocate 32 full cores with 30 coming from the first 3 NUMA nodes (filling them up) and 2 coming from the fourth NUMA node",
			topoDualSocketMultiNumaPerSocketHT,

80:
   DestinationRule: a\..* for "a"
      Matching subsets: v1
      No Traffic Policy
`)

	describePodAOutput = describeSvcAOutput
)

// This test requires `--istio.test.env=kube` because it tests istioctl doing PodExec
// TestVersion does "istioctl version --remote=true" to verify the CLI understands the data plane version data
func TestVersion(t *testing.T) {
	// nolint: staticcheck
	framework.
		NewTest(t).RequiresSingleCluster().

    thread.joinSuccessfully(LONG_DELAY_MS);
    assertInterrupted();
  }

  public void testJoinTimeoutMultiInterruptExpired() {
    /*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a thread completion at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive join() call.
     */
    TimedThread thread = TimedThread.createWithDelay(LONG_DELAY_MS);