} else {
        showDialog(null);
        location.reload();  // Reload to show updated config menu
      }
    });
  }

  function handleSaveInputKey(e) {
    if (e.key === 'Enter') commitSave(e);
  }

  function deleteConfig(e, elem) {
    e.preventDefault();
    const config = elem.dataset.config;
    delPrompt.innerText = 'Delete ' + config + '?';
    currentDeleteTarget = elem;

	if err != nil {
		t.Skipf("skipping because opening /dev/tty failed: %v", err)
	}

	go func() {
		var buf [1]byte
		f.Read(buf[:])
	}()

	// Give the goroutine a chance to enter the read.
	// It doesn't matter much if it occasionally fails to do so,
	// we won't be testing what we want to test but the test will pass.
	time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)

	c := make(chan bool)
	go func() {

  std::vector<Output> dx;
  TF_RETURN_IF_ERROR(AddWhileLoopGradient(while_ctx, while_scope, dy, &dx));

  // Backprop along the in edges to the while loop (i.e. the inputs to the enter
  // nodes)
  DCHECK_EQ(dx.size(), while_ctx->enter_nodes().size());
  for (int i = 0, end = dx.size(); i < end; ++i) {
    Node* enter_node = while_ctx->enter_nodes()[i];

        columnIterator = rowEntry.getValue().entrySet().iterator();
      }
      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe because:
       *
       * - columnIterator started off pointing to an empty iterator, so we must have entered the
       *   `if` body above at least once. Thus, if we got this far, that `if` body initialized
       *   rowEntry at least once.
       *

`パスワード`の「フロー」は、OAuth2で定義されているセキュリティと認証を扱う方法 (「フロー」) の1つです。

OAuth2は、バックエンドやAPIがユーザーを認証するサーバーから独立したものとして設計されていました。

しかし、この場合、同じ**FastAPI**アプリケーションがAPIと認証を処理します。

そこで、簡略化した箇所から見直してみましょう:

* ユーザーはフロントエンドで`ユーザー名`と`パスワード`を入力し、`Enter`を押します。
* フロントエンド (ユーザーのブラウザで実行中) は、`ユーザー名`と`パスワード`をAPIの特定のURL (`tokenUrl="token"`で宣言された) に送信します。
* APIは`ユーザー名`と`パスワード`をチェックし、「トークン」を返却します (まだ実装していません)。
    * 「トークン」はただの文字列であり、あとでこのユーザーを検証するために使用します。

// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

// Go execution tracer.
// The tracer captures a wide range of execution events like goroutine
// creation/blocking/unblocking, syscall enter/exit/block, GC-related events,
// changes of heap size, processor start/stop, etc and writes them to a buffer
// in a compact form. A precise nanosecond-precision timestamp and a stack
// trace is captured for most events.
//

				curResourceQuota := cur.(*v1.ResourceQuota)
				if quota.Equals(oldResourceQuota.Spec.Hard, curResourceQuota.Spec.Hard) {
					return
				}
				rq.addQuota(logger, curResourceQuota)
			},
			// This will enter the sync loop and no-op, because the controller has been deleted from the store.
			// Note that deleting a controller immediately after scaling it to 0 will not work. The recommended

			}
		} else {
			if sect.name == "__bss" {
				bld.SetType(sym.SNOPTRBSS)
				bld.SetData(nil)
			} else {
				bld.SetType(sym.SNOPTRDATA)
			}
		}

		sect.sym = s
	}

	// enter sub-symbols into symbol table.
	// have to guess sizes from next symbol.
	for i := uint32(0); i < symtab.nsym; i++ {
		machsym := &symtab.sym[i]
		if machsym.type_&N_STAB != 0 {
			continue
		}

			// the non-starving case it is possible for a different waiter
			// to acquire the semaphore while we are yielding/scheduling,
			// and this would be wasteful. We wait instead to enter starving
			// regime, and then we start to do direct handoffs of ticket and
			// P.
			// See issue 33747 for discussion.
			goyield()
		}
	}
}

func cansemacquire(addr *uint32) bool {
	for {

	keeps their state close to the point of panic. Setting
	dontfreezetheworld=1 disables this preemption, allowing goroutines to
	continue executing during panic processing. Note that goroutines that
	naturally enter the scheduler will still stop. This can be useful when
	debugging the runtime scheduler, as freezetheworld perturbs scheduler
	state and thus may hide problems.

	efence: setting efence=1 causes the allocator to run in a mode