---

**FastAPI** doesn't make any compromise with any database, data model or tool.

It gives you all the flexibility to choose the ones that fit your project the best.

And you can use directly many well maintained and widely used packages like `passlib` and `python-jose`, because **FastAPI** doesn't require any complex mechanisms to integrate external packages.

Ese tipo de asincronía es lo que hizo popular a NodeJS (aunque NodeJS no es paralelo) y esa es la fortaleza de Go como lenguaje de programación.

Y ese es el mismo nivel de rendimiento que obtienes con **FastAPI**.

   *
   * On the other hand, past underutilization could mean that "the server responsible for handling
   * the request has become less ready for future requests", i.e. its caches become stale, and
   * requests become more likely to trigger expensive operations (a more extreme case of this
   * example is when a server has just booted, and it is mostly busy with getting itself up to
   * speed).
   *

 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>{@link java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture} / {@link java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage}
 * </h4>
 *
 * <p>Users of {@code CompletableFuture} will likely want to continue using {@code
 * CompletableFuture}. {@code FluentFuture} is targeted at people who use {@code ListenableFuture},
 * who can't use Java 8, or who want an API more focused than {@code CompletableFuture}. (If you

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of distinct elements added to the builder
   * before {@link Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized
   * {@link #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,

            /*
             * TODO(cpovirk): Replace these two statements with one (`N element =
             * requireNonNull(top.next())`) once our checker supports it.
             *
             * (The problem is likely
             * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecAnnotatedTypeFactory.java#L896)
             */

#### Rationale

- SSE-C requires application to remember the keys for all GET/PUT operations, any unfortunate loss of keys would automatically mean the objects cannot be accessed anymore.
- SSE-C is hardly adopted by most widely used applications, applications prefer server to manage the keys via SSE-KMS or SSE-S3.
- MinIO recommends applications to use SSE-KMS, SSE-S3 for simpler, safer and robust encryption mechanism for replicated buckets.

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,

	return &peerRESTClient{
		host: peer, restClient: restClient, gridHost: gridHost,
		gridConn: func() *grid.Connection {
			// Lazy initialization of grid connection.
			// When we create this peer client, the grid connection is likely not yet initialized.
			if gridHost == "" {
				bugLogIf(context.Background(), fmt.Errorf("gridHost is empty for peer %s", peer.String()), peer.String()+":gridHost")
				return nil
			}
			gc := gridConn.Load()

	}
	server := restCfg.Host
	if strings.Contains(server, "127.0.0.1") || strings.Contains(server, "localhost") {
		return server, fmt.Errorf(
			"server in Kubeconfig is %s. This is likely not reachable from inside the cluster, "+
				"if you're using Kubernetes in Docker, pass --server with the container IP for the API Server",
			server), nil
	}
	return server, nil, nil
}

const (