*
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Long#toUnsignedString(long)} instead.
   */
  public static String toString(long x) {
    return toString(x, 10);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a string representation of {@code x} for the given radix, where {@code x} is treated as
   * unsigned.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Long#toUnsignedString(long, int)} instead.
   *

   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Integer#toUnsignedString(int)} instead.
   */
  public static String toString(int x) {
    return toString(x, 10);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a string representation of {@code x} for the given radix, where {@code x} is treated as
   * unsigned.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Integer#toUnsignedString(int, int)} instead.
   *

Tel que `/users/me`, disons pour récupérer les données sur l'utilisateur actuel.

Et vous avez un second chemin : `/users/{user_id}` pour récupérer de la donnée sur un utilisateur spécifique grâce à son identifiant d'utilisateur

Les *fonctions de chemin* étant évaluées dans l'ordre, il faut s'assurer que la fonction correspondant à `/users/me` est déclarée avant celle de `/users/{user_id}` :

```Python hl_lines="6  11"

@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class Functions {
  private Functions() {}

  /**
   * A function equivalent to the method reference {@code Object::toString}, for users not yet using
   * Java 8. The function simply invokes {@code toString} on its argument and returns the result. It
   * throws a {@link NullPointerException} on null input.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> The returned function may not be <i>consistent with equals</i> (as

`get_current_active_user` 🔗 ✔️ 🎧-🔗 🔛 `get_current_user`, ↔ `"me"` 📣 `get_current_active_user` 🔜 🔌 📇 ✔ ↔ `security_scopes.scopes` 🚶‍♀️ `get_current_user`.

*➡ 🛠️* ⚫️ 📣 ↔, `"items"`, 👉 🔜 📇 `security_scopes.scopes` 🚶‍♀️ `get_current_user`.

📥 ❔ 🔗 🔗 & ↔ 👀 💖:

*  *➡ 🛠️* `read_own_items` ✔️:
    * ✔ ↔ `["items"]` ⏮️ 🔗:
    * `get_current_active_user`:
        *  🔗 🔢 `get_current_active_user` ✔️:

 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of
 * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere
 * near enough users to justify the costs.
 *

Etwa `/users/me`, um Daten über den aktuellen Benutzer zu erhalten.

Und Sie haben auch einen Pfad `/users/{user_id}`, um Daten über einen spezifischen Benutzer zu erhalten, mittels einer Benutzer-ID.

Weil *Pfadoperationen* in ihrer Reihenfolge ausgewertet werden, müssen Sie sicherstellen, dass der Pfad `/users/me` vor `/users/{user_id}` deklariert wurde:

```Python hl_lines="6  11"

                For example, a single string with:

                ```python
                "items:read items:write users:read profile openid"
                ````

                would represent the scopes:

                * `items:read`
                * `items:write`
                * `users:read`
                * `profile`
                * `openid`
                """
            ),
        ] = "",

ts[].actions[]` - list of actions granted ### Create user after install Install the chart, specifying the users you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set users[0].accessKey=accessKey,users[0].secretKey=secretKey,users[0].policy=none,users[1].accessKey=accessKey2,users[1].secretRef=existingSecret,users[1].secretKey=password,users[1].policy=none minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `users[].accessKey` - accessKey of user - `users[].secretKey`...

    ```

#### About `**user_dict`

`UserInDB(**user_dict)` means:

*Pass the keys and values of the `user_dict` directly as key-value arguments, equivalent to:*

```Python
UserInDB(
    username = user_dict["username"],
    email = user_dict["email"],
    full_name = user_dict["full_name"],
    disabled = user_dict["disabled"],
    hashed_password = user_dict["hashed_password"],
)
```