package types

import "go/token"

// validType verifies that the given type does not "expand" indefinitely
// producing a cycle in the type graph.
// (Cycles involving alias types, as in "type A = [10]A" are detected
// earlier, via the objDecl cycle detection mechanism.)
func (check *Checker) validType(typ *Named) {
	check.validType0(nopos, typ, nil, nil)
}

 *       verified or created.
 *   <li>If a new edge needs to be created, the outgoing edges of the acquired locks are traversed
 *       to check for a cycle that reaches the lock to be acquired. If no cycle is detected, a new
 *       "safe" edge is created.
 *   <li>If a cycle is detected, an "unsafe" (cyclic) edge is created to represent a potential
 *       deadlock situation, and the appropriate Policy is executed.
 * </ul>
 *

 *       verified or created.
 *   <li>If a new edge needs to be created, the outgoing edges of the acquired locks are traversed
 *       to check for a cycle that reaches the lock to be acquired. If no cycle is detected, a new
 *       "safe" edge is created.
 *   <li>If a cycle is detected, an "unsafe" (cyclic) edge is created to represent a potential
 *       deadlock situation, and the appropriate Policy is executed.
 * </ul>
 *

       *
       * Maybe there is a way to avoid this cycle. But we think the cycle is safe enough to ignore:
       * Each task is retained for only as long as it is running -- so it's retained only as long as
       * it would already be retained by the underlying executor.
       *
       * If the cycle test starts reporting this cycle in the future, we should add an entry to
       * cycle_suppress_list.txt.
       */

	expectInt(t, completions.Load, 1)

	// drop RBAC permissions to update the configmap
	// This simulates loosing an active lease
	allowRbac.Store(false)

	// We should start a new cycle at this point
	expectInt(t, l.cycle.Load, 2)

	// Add configmap permission back
	allowRbac.Store(true)

	// We should get the leader lock back
	expectInt(t, completions.Load, 2)

	close(stop)
}

       *
       * Maybe there is a way to avoid this cycle. But we think the cycle is safe enough to ignore:
       * Each task is retained for only as long as it is running -- so it's retained only as long as
       * it would already be retained by the underlying executor.
       *
       * If the cycle test starts reporting this cycle in the future, we should add an entry to
       * cycle_suppress_list.txt.
       */

	minSleep time.Duration

	// cycle will be closed
	cycle chan struct{}

	// isScanner should be set when this is used by the scanner
	// to record metrics.
	isScanner bool
}

// newDynamicSleeper
func newDynamicSleeper(factor float64, maxWait time.Duration, isScanner bool) *dynamicSleeper {
	return &dynamicSleeper{
		factor:    factor,
		cycle:     make(chan struct{}),
		maxSleep:  maxWait,

        "copy"                 | _
        "filteredTree"         | _
    }

    def "builds correct artifacts when there is a project cycle in dependency graph - fluid: #fluid"() {
        makeFluid(fluid)

        // A graph from root compile -> child default -> root default, so not an actual cycle here
        // Graph includes artifact and file dependencies on each node, should build all of them
        buildFile << """

        }

        /**
         * Returns the evaluation cycle.
         * The list represents a "stack" of owners currently being evaluated, and is at least two elements long.
         * The first and last elements of the list are the same owner.
         *
         * @return the evaluation cycle as a list
         */
        public List<EvaluationOwner> getEvaluationCycle() {

// the chain by setting the underlying type for each defined type in the
// chain before returning it. If no underlying type is found or a cycle
// is detected, the result is Typ[Invalid]. If a cycle is detected and
// n0.check != nil, the cycle is reported.
//
// This is necessary because the underlying type of named may be itself a
// named type that is incomplete:
//
//	type (
//		A B
//		B *C