}

  /**
   * Creates a garbage object that counts down the latch in its finalizer. Sequestered into a
   * separate method to make it somewhat more likely to be unreachable.
   */
  private static void createUnreachableLatchFinalizer(CountDownLatch latch) {
    Object unused =
        new Object() {
          @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/260137033

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(int[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    ImmutableSet<String> validIsatapAddresses =
        ImmutableSet.of(
            "2001:db8::5efe:102:304",
            "2001:db8::100:5efe:102:304", // Private Multicast? Not likely.
            "2001:db8::200:5efe:102:304",
            "2001:db8::300:5efe:102:304" // Public Multicast? Also unlikely.
            );
    ImmutableSet<String> nonIsatapAddresses =
        ImmutableSet.of(

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,

   * value slightly too high than slightly too low. If the value is not exact, the {@link
   * ImmutableLongArray} that is built will very likely occupy more memory than strictly necessary;
   * to trim memory usage, build using {@code builder.build().trimmed()}.
   */
  public static Builder builder(int initialCapacity) {

          // likely number of trials to have proven 2-bit candidate
          // is not a characteristic
          count++;
          if (count > maxCount) {
            Assert.fail(
                "2-bit delta ("
                    + i
                    + ", "
                    + j
                    + ") is likely a "

        secondBarrier.await();
      }
    }

    @Override
    protected ScheduledExecutorService executor() {
      // use a bunch of threads so that weird overlapping schedules are more likely to happen.
      return Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(10);
    }

    @Override
    protected Scheduler scheduler() {
      return new CustomScheduler() {
        @Override

   * loader of that class from being garbage-collected even if there is a {@link SecurityManager}.
   * The {@link SecurityManager} environment makes such leaks more likely because when you create a
   * {@link URLClassLoader} with a {@link SecurityManager}, the creating code's {@link
   * java.security.AccessControlContext} is captured, and that references the creating code's {@link

   * resulting segment inside the cache <i>independently</i> limits its own size to approximately
   * {@code maximumSize / concurrencyLevel}.
   *
   * <p>When eviction is necessary, the cache evicts entries that are less likely to be used again.
   * For example, the cache may evict an entry because it hasn't been used recently or very often.
   *
   * <p>If {@code maximumSize} is zero, elements will be evicted immediately after being loaded into

   * implementation of iterator() to define its contents, and methods like contains() are
   * implemented in terms of that method (though they will likely be overridden by subclasses for
   * performance reasons).) This means that a call to this method have can different behavior in GWT
   * and non-GWT environments UNLESS subclasses are careful to always override all methods