*
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Float#BYTES} instead.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */
  public static final int BYTES = Float.SIZE / Byte.SIZE;

  /**
   * Returns a hash code for {@code value}; equal to the result of invoking {@code ((Float)
   * value).hashCode()}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Float#hashCode(float)} instead.
   *

   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new
   *     RuntimeException(e)}. But consider whether users would be better off if your API threw a
   *     different type of exception. For background on the deprecation, read <a
   *     href="https://goo.gl/Ivn2kc">Why we deprecated {@code Throwables.propagate}</a>.
   */

   * on its instance of {@code TypeVariableImpl}. Otherwise it throws {@link
   * UnsupportedOperationException}; this should only apply to {@code getAnnotatedBounds()}. This
   * does mean that users on Java 8 who obtain an instance of {@code TypeVariable} from {@link
   * TypeResolver#resolveType} will not be able to call {@code getAnnotatedBounds()} on it, but that
   * should hopefully be rare.
   *

 * <ul>
 *   <li><a href="https://dagger.dev/producers.html">Dagger Producers</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>{@link java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture} / {@link java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage}
 * </h4>
 *
 * <p>Users of {@code CompletableFuture} will likely want to continue using {@code
 * CompletableFuture}. {@code FluentFuture} is targeted at people who use {@code ListenableFuture},

   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new
   *     RuntimeException(e)}. But consider whether users would be better off if your API threw a
   *     different type of exception. For background on the deprecation, read <a
   *     href="https://goo.gl/Ivn2kc">Why we deprecated {@code Throwables.propagate}</a>.
   */

    executor.execute(task);
    assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible

   *
   * @since 33.2.0 (available since 21.0 in guava-jre)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({"AndroidJdkLibsChecker", "Java7ApiChecker"})
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using streams.
  @Beta // TODO: b/288085449 - Remove.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, R, C, V>
      Collector<T, ?, ImmutableTable<R, C, V>> toImmutableTable(

  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeFine2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();

    // Sadly, the following is what users will have to do in some circumstances.

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // safe covariant cast
    Optional<Number> first = (Optional<Number>) numbers.first();
    Number value = first.or(0.5); // fine
  }

   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Character#BYTES} instead.
   */
  public static final int BYTES = Character.SIZE / Byte.SIZE;

  /**
   * Returns a hash code for {@code value}; equal to the result of invoking {@code ((Character)
   * value).hashCode()}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Character#hashCode(char)} instead.
   *

import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Provides static methods for working with {@code Collection} instances.
 *
 * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> several common uses for this class are now more comprehensively
 * addressed by the new {@link java.util.stream.Stream} library. Read the method documentation below