import static java.util.Arrays.asList;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.isA;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.eq;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

import com.google.common.base.Equivalence;
import com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature;
import com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionSize;

    final Lock lock;

    LockingThread(Lock lock) {
      this.lock = lock;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
      lock.lock();
      try {
        locked.countDown();
        finishLatch.await(1, TimeUnit.MINUTES);
      } catch (InterruptedException e) {
        fail(e.toString());
      } finally {
        lock.unlock();
      }
    }

 * test with reference to the same "lock-like object", and then their interactions with that object
 * are choreographed via the various methods on this class.
 *
 * <p>A "lock-like object" is really any object that may be used for concurrency control. If the
 * {@link #callAndAssertBlocks} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a

   * ListenableFuture} listeners, should take care not to do so while holding a lock. Additionally,
   * as a further line of defense, prefer not to perform any locking inside a task that will be run
   * under {@code directExecutor}: Not only might the wait for a lock be long, but if the running
   * thread was holding a lock, the listener may deadlock or break lock isolation.
   *
   * <p>This instance is equivalent to:
   *

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Invokes {@code lock.}{@link Lock#tryLock(long, TimeUnit) tryLock(timeout, unit)}
   * uninterruptibly.
   *
   * @since 30.0
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // should accept a java.time.Duration
  public static boolean tryLockUninterruptibly(Lock lock, long timeout, TimeUnit unit) {
    boolean interrupted = false;

   * needed.
   *
   * A single spinlock ("busy") is used for initializing and
   * resizing the table, as well as populating slots with new Cells.
   * There is no need for a blocking lock; when the lock is not
   * available, threads try other slots (or the base).  During these
   * retries, there is increased contention and reduced locality,
   * which is still better than alternatives.
   *

  /**
   * Interrupts the running task. Because this internally calls {@link Thread#interrupt()} which can
   * in turn invoke arbitrary code it is not safe to call while holding a lock.
   */
  final void interruptTask() {
    // Since the Thread is replaced by DONE before run() invokes listeners or returns, if we succeed

   * needed.
   *
   * A single spinlock ("busy") is used for initializing and
   * resizing the table, as well as populating slots with new Cells.
   * There is no need for a blocking lock; when the lock is not
   * available, threads try other slots (or the base).  During these
   * retries, there is increased contention and reduced locality,
   * which is still better than alternatives.
   *

   * value, you should always choose it explicitly.
   *
   * <p>The current implementation uses the concurrency level to create a fixed number of hashtable
   * segments, each governed by its own write lock. The segment lock is taken once for each explicit
   * write, and twice for each cache loading computation (once prior to loading the new value, and
   * once after loading completes). Much internal cache management is performed at the segment

import java.util.List;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Unit test for IteratorTester.
 *
 * @author Mick Killianey
 */
@GwtCompatible
@SuppressWarnings("serial") // No serialization is used in this test
public class IteratorTesterTest extends TestCase {

  public void testCanCatchDifferentLengthOfIteration() {