* signature doesn't say so explicitly, the map returned by {@link #asMap} has {@code Set} values.
 *
 * <p>If the values corresponding to a single key should be ordered according to a {@link
 * java.util.Comparator} (or the natural order), see the {@link SortedSetMultimap} subinterface.
 *
 * <p>Since the value collections are sets, the behavior of a {@code SetMultimap} is not specified

   *
   * <p>Although all tasks are immediately executed in the thread that submitted the task, this
   * {@code ExecutorService} imposes a small locking overhead on each task submission in order to
   * implement shutdown and termination behavior.
   *
   * <p>Because of the nature of single-thread execution, the methods {@code scheduleAtFixedRate}

   * {@code EnumBiMap}, the new bimap has the same types as the provided map. Otherwise, the
   * specified map must contain at least one mapping, in order to determine the key and value types.
   *
   * @param map the map whose mappings are to be placed in this map
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if map is not an {@code EnumBiMap} instance and contains no
   *     mappings

      fail();
    } catch (VerifyException expected) {
      checkMessage(expected);
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointers() {
    // Don't bother testing: Verify is like Preconditions. See the discussion on that class.
  }

  private static final Object IGNORE_ME =
      new Object() {
        @Override
        public String toString() {

   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *
     * 1. The client thread begins to block on a get() call to a future.
     * 2. The client thread is interrupted sometime before the result would be
     *   available.

    checkNotNull(columnFunction, "columnFunction");
    checkNotNull(valueFunction, "valueFunction");
    checkNotNull(mergeFunction, "mergeFunction");

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(

      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testCreateEmptyRangeOpenClosedSucceeds() {
    for (Integer i : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
      GeneralRange<@Nullable Integer> range = GeneralRange.range(ORDERING, i, OPEN, i, CLOSED);
      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

        .withFeatures(
            CollectionFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE, CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER, CollectionSize.ANY)
        .suppressing(suppressForLinkedBlockingQueue())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  // Not specifying KNOWN_ORDER for PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue
  // even though they do have it, because our tests interpret KNOWN_ORDER to
  // also mean that the iterator returns the head element first, which those
  // don't.

      }

      @Override
      public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {
        List<String> order = Lists.newArrayList();
        for (String s : insertionOrder) {
          int index = order.indexOf(s);
          if (index == -1) {
            order.add(s);
          } else {
            order.add(index, s);
          }
        }
        return order;
      }
    };
  }

  public void testCreate() {

    return new String[length];
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>By default, returns the supplied elements in their given order; however, generators for
   * containers with a known order other than insertion order must override this method.
   *
   * <p>Note: This default implementation is overkill (but valid) for an unordered container. An