a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our
        users indicates that they really appreciate Guava's high power-to-weight ratio. It's
        important to us to keep Guava as easy to use and understand as we can. That means boiling
        features down to compact but powerful abstractions, and controlling feature bloat carefully.

    return new ConstantWeigher(constant);
  }

  /** Returns a {@link Weigher} that uses the integer key as the weight. */
  static Weigher<Integer, Object> intKeyWeigher() {
    return new IntKeyWeigher();
  }

  /** Returns a {@link Weigher} that uses the integer value as the weight. */
  static Weigher<Object, Integer> intValueWeigher() {
    return new IntValueWeigher();
  }

  @LazyInit @CheckForNull private transient Ordering<@Nullable Comparable<?>> nullsLast;

  @Override
  public int compare(Comparable<?> left, Comparable<?> right) {
    checkNotNull(left); // for GWT
    checkNotNull(right);
    return ((Comparable<Object>) left).compareTo(right);
  }

  @Override
  public <S extends Comparable<?>> Ordering<@Nullable S> nullsFirst() {
    Ordering<@Nullable Comparable<?>> result = nullsFirst;

      return asList(all).subList(2, elements.length + 2);
    }
  }

  private static Float[] concat(Float[] left, Float[] right) {
    Float[] result = new Float[left.length + right.length];
    System.arraycopy(left, 0, result, 0, left.length);
    System.arraycopy(right, 0, result, left.length, right.length);
    return result;
  }

  public abstract static class TestFloatListGenerator implements TestListGenerator<Float> {

   * be declared as a {@code List}.
   *
   * <p>Note also that serialization is not in general required to return an object that is
   * {@linkplain Object#equals equal} to the original, nor is it required to return even an object
   * of the same class. For example, if sublists of {@code MyList} instances were serializable,

/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

  static final AllEqualOrdering INSTANCE = new AllEqualOrdering();

  @Override
  public int compare(@CheckForNull Object left, @CheckForNull Object right) {
    return 0;
  }

  @Override
  public <E extends @Nullable Object> List<E> sortedCopy(Iterable<E> iterable) {
    return Lists.newArrayList(iterable);
  }

  @Override

  static final AllEqualOrdering INSTANCE = new AllEqualOrdering();

  @Override
  public int compare(@CheckForNull Object left, @CheckForNull Object right) {
    return 0;
  }

  @Override
  public <E extends @Nullable Object> List<E> sortedCopy(Iterable<E> iterable) {
    return Lists.newArrayList(iterable);
  }

  @Override

    assertEquals(20, counter.skip(30));
    assertEquals(20, counter.getCount());
    assertEquals(0, counter.skip(20));
    assertEquals(20, counter.getCount());

    // Test reading a single byte while we're in the right state
    assertEquals(-1, counter.read());
    assertEquals(20, counter.getCount());
  }

  public void testReadArrayEOF() throws IOException {
    assertEquals(20, counter.read(new byte[30]));

     * do that with a plain NonTerminalImmutableMapEntry, but we do it with the BiMap-specific
     * subclass below. That's because the Entry might be non-terminal in the key bucket but terminal
     * in the value bucket (or vice versa).
     */
    @CheckForNull private final transient ImmutableMapEntry<K, V> nextInKeyBucket;

    NonTerminalImmutableMapEntry(