private static final Integer I0 = -45;
  private static final Integer I1 = -1;
  private static final Integer I2 = 3;
  private static final String S0 = "3";
  private static final String S1 = "Ninety five";
  private static final String S2 = "44 one million";
  private static final String S3 = "Lowly laundry lefties";
  private static final String S4 = "89273487U#*&#";
  private static final Double D0 = 9.234d;

  private ClassToInstanceMap<Number> map;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    map = MutableClassToInstanceMap.create();
  }

  public void testConstraint() {

    /**
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself

  private ClassToInstanceMap<Number> map;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    map = MutableClassToInstanceMap.create();
  }

  public void testConstraint() {

    /**
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself

    assertEquals(
        thread.getName().substring(0, thread.getName().lastIndexOf('-')),
        thread2.getName().substring(0, thread.getName().lastIndexOf('-')));

    // Building again should give us a different pool ID.
    ThreadFactory threadFactory2 = builder.build();
    Thread thread3 = threadFactory2.newThread(monitoredRunnable);
    checkThreadPoolName(thread3, 1);

   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller

          mapEntry("one", collectionOf(10000)),
          mapEntry("two", collectionOf(-2000)),
          mapEntry("three", collectionOf(300)),
          mapEntry("four", collectionOf(-40)),
          mapEntry("five", collectionOf(5)));
    }

    // javac7 can't infer the type parameters correctly in samples()
    private static Collection<Integer> collectionOf(int item) {
      return ImmutableSet.of(item);
    }

 * {@link System#currentTimeMillis()}, best represented as an {@link java.time.Instant}. Such values
 * <i>can</i> be subtracted to obtain a {@code Duration} (such as by {@code Duration.between}), but
 * doing so does <i>not</i> give a reliable measurement of elapsed time, because wall time readings
 * are inherently approximate, routinely affected by periodic clock corrections. Because this class

    assertEquals(2, queue.size());
    assertEquals(1, queue.remainingCapacity());
  }

  public void testAddAll_largeList() {
    final List<String> list = ImmutableList.of("one", "two", "three", "four", "five");
    List<String> misbehavingList =
        new AbstractList<String>() {
          @Override
          public int size() {
            return list.size();
          }

          @Override

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect.testing;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.util.Iterator;

/**
 * Adapts a test iterable generator to give a TestIteratorGenerator.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class DerivedTestIteratorGenerator<E>
    implements TestIteratorGenerator<E>, DerivedGenerator {

  // to the given dividend, so that we don't have half of our divisions being
  // trivial because the divisor is bigger than the dividend.
  // Using remainder here does not give us a uniform distribution but it should
  // not have a big impact on the measurement.
  private static long randomDivisor(long dividend) {
    long r = RANDOM_SOURCE.nextLong();
    if (dividend == -1) {
      return r;