import com.google.common.collect.BenchmarkHelpers.SetImpl;

/**
 * This is meant to be used with {@code --measureMemory} to measure the memory usage of various
 * {@code Set} implementations.
 *
 * @author Christopher Swenson
 */
public class SetCreationBenchmark {
  @Param({
    "3", "6", "11", "23", "45", "91", "181", "362", "724", "1448", "2896", "5793", "11585", "23170",

   * not fail a test when an exception is thrown from one of its {@link TearDown} instances, but
   * this is subject to change. Also, {@code junit4.TearDownTestCase} will.
   *
   * @throws Exception for any reason. {@code TearDownTestCase} ensures that any exception thrown
   *     will not interfere with other TearDown operations.
   */
  void tearDown() throws Exception;

import com.google.common.collect.CollectionBenchmarkSampleData.Element;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Test iteration speed at various size for {@link Set} instances.
 *
 * @author Christopher Swenson
 */
public class SetIterationBenchmark {
  @Param({
    "3", "6", "11", "23", "45", "91", "181", "362", "724", "1448", "2896", "5793", "11585", "23170",

    for (StandardSystemProperty property : StandardSystemProperty.values()) {
      // Even though the contract in System.getProperties() specifies that a value will exist for
      // all of the listed keys, for some reason the "java.compiler" key returns null in some JVMs.
      if (property == JAVA_COMPILER) {
        continue;
      }
      // Removed in Java 9:

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

 * java.util.LinkedHashSet}. Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory
 * consumption at the price of moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class
 * when there is a specific reason to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

    CombinedFutureInterruptibleTask<?> localTask = task;
    if (localTask != null) {
      localTask.execute();
    }
  }

  @Override
  void releaseResources(ReleaseResourcesReason reason) {
    super.releaseResources(reason);
    /*
     * If the output future is done, then it won't need to interrupt the task later, so it can clear
     * its reference to it.
     *

import com.google.common.collect.BenchmarkHelpers.SetImpl;

/**
 * This is meant to be used with {@code --measureMemory} to measure the memory usage of various
 * {@code Set} implementations.
 *
 * @author Christopher Swenson
 */
public class SetCreationBenchmark {
  @Param({
    "3", "6", "11", "23", "45", "91", "181", "362", "724", "1448", "2896", "5793", "11585", "23170",

   */
  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<E> expectedCollection) {
    List<E> expectedList = Helpers.copyToList(expectedCollection);
    // Avoid expectEquals() here to delay reason manufacture until necessary.
    if (getList().size() != expectedList.size()) {
      fail("size mismatch: " + reportContext(expectedList));
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < expectedList.size(); i++) {

 * the License.
 */

package com.google.common.base;

/**
 * Common benchmarking utilities.
 *
 * @author Christopher Swenson
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
class BenchmarkHelpers {
  private static final String WHITESPACE_CHARACTERS =
      "\u00a0\u180e\u202f\t\n\013\f\r \u0085"