import com.google.caliper.Param;
import com.google.common.collect.BenchmarkHelpers.SetImpl;
import com.google.common.collect.CollectionBenchmarkSampleData.Element;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * A microbenchmark that tests the performance of contains() on various Set implementations.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
public class SetContainsBenchmark {
  // Start at 4.88 then multiply by 2*2^phi <evil cackle> - The goal is be uniform

import com.google.caliper.Param;
import com.google.common.collect.BenchmarkHelpers.SetImpl;
import com.google.common.collect.CollectionBenchmarkSampleData.Element;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * A microbenchmark that tests the performance of contains() on various Set implementations.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
public class SetContainsBenchmark {
  // Start at 4.88 then multiply by 2*2^phi <evil cackle> - The goal is be uniform

 *
 * <p>The core interface used to represent caches is {@link Cache}. In-memory caches can be
 * configured and created using {@link CacheBuilder}, with cache entries being loaded by {@link
 * CacheLoader}. Statistics about cache performance are exposed using {@link CacheStats}.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/CachesExplained">caches</a>.
 *

 *
 * <p>The core interface used to represent caches is {@link Cache}. In-memory caches can be
 * configured and created using {@link CacheBuilder}, with cache entries being loaded by {@link
 * CacheLoader}. Statistics about cache performance are exposed using {@link CacheStats}.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/CachesExplained">caches</a>.
 *

 * or even removal, in a future release. An API bearing this annotation is exempt from any
 * compatibility guarantees made by its containing library. Note that the presence of this
 * annotation implies nothing about the quality or performance of the API in question, only the fact
 * that it is not "API-frozen."
 *
 * <p>It is generally safe for <i>applications</i> to depend on beta APIs, at the cost of some extra

import com.google.caliper.BeforeExperiment;
import com.google.caliper.Benchmark;
import com.google.common.collect.MapMaker;
import java.util.Map;

/**
 * Compare CacheBuilder and MapMaker performance, ensuring that they remain on par with each other.
 *
 * @author Nikita Sidorov
 */
@SuppressWarnings("CheckReturnValue")
public class MapMakerComparisonBenchmark {
  private static final String TEST_KEY = "test key";

    // than wrapping cbuf in a light-weight CharSequence.
    target.append(new String(cbuf, off, len));
  }

  /*
   * Override a few functions for performance reasons to avoid creating unnecessary strings.
   */

  @Override
  public void write(int c) throws IOException {
    checkNotClosed();
    target.append((char) c);
  }

  @Override

/**
 * Provides similar behavior to {@link String#intern} for any immutable type. Common implementations
 * are available from the {@link Interners} class.
 *
 * <p>Note that {@code String.intern()} has some well-known performance limitations, and should
 * generally be avoided. Prefer {@link Interners#newWeakInterner} or another {@code Interner}
 * implementation even for {@code String} interning.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 3.0

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): if we start to override indexOf/lastIndexOf under GWT, we'll want some way to
   * override subList to return an ImmutableSortedAsList for better performance. Right now, I'm not
   * sure there's any performance hit from our failure to override subListUnchecked under GWT
   */
  @Override
  ImmutableList<E> subListUnchecked(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {

import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.OutputStream;
import java.io.StringReader;
import java.io.StringWriter;
import java.util.Random;

/** Benchmark for {@code BaseEncoding} performance. */
public class BaseEncodingBenchmark {
  private static final int INPUTS_COUNT = 0x1000;
  private static final int INPUTS_MASK = 0xFFF;

  enum EncodingOption {
    BASE64(BaseEncoding.base64()),