without any of its other classes -- but is also available in a second
    "version" that omits the class to avoid conflicts with the copy in Guava
    itself. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...

    pragmatic software license, and a desire to create high quality software that leads the way in its field.
    We consider ourselves not simply a group of projects sharing a server, but rather a community of developers
    and users.
  </description>
  <licenses>
    <license>
      <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
      <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
      <distribution>repo</distribution>

    pragmatic software license, and a desire to create high quality software that leads the way in its field.
    We consider ourselves not simply a group of projects sharing a server, but rather a community of developers
    and users.
  </description>
  <licenses>
    <license>
      <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
      <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
      <distribution>repo</distribution>

under the License.
-->

<toolchains>
  <toolchain>
     <type>basic</type>
     <configuration>
       <user>true</user>
     </configuration>
  </toolchain>
  <toolchain>
     <type>rare</type>
     <configuration>
       <user>true</user>
     </configuration>
  </toolchain>

  <inceptionYear>2003</inceptionYear>
  <mailingLists>
    <mailingList>
      <name>Maven Wagon User List</name>
      <subscribe>wagon-users******@****.***</subscribe>
      <unsubscribe>wagon-users******@****.***</unsubscribe>
      <archive>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-wagon-users/</archive>
    </mailingList>
    <mailingList>
      <name>Maven Wagon Developer List</name>

    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
      <!-- *not* <scope>test</scope>; <scope>compile</scope> is right so that guava-testlib users get junit transitively. -->
      <version>4.13.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <!--
      Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
      -->

    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
      <!-- *not* <scope>test</scope>; <scope>compile</scope> is right so that guava-testlib users get junit transitively. -->
      <version>4.13.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <!--
      Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
      -->

    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...

  <inceptionYear>2003</inceptionYear>
  <mailingLists>
    <mailingList>
      <name>Maven Wagon User List</name>
      <subscribe>wagon-users******@****.***</subscribe>
      <unsubscribe>wagon-users******@****.***</unsubscribe>
      <archive>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-wagon-users/</archive>
    </mailingList>
    <mailingList>
      <name>Maven Wagon Developer List</name>

  <name>Guava InternalFutureFailureAccess and InternalFutures</name>
  <description>
    Contains
    com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal.InternalFutureFailureAccess and
    InternalFutures. Most users will never need to use this artifact. Its
    classes are conceptually a part of Guava, but they're in this separate
    artifact so that Android libraries can use them without pulling in all of