* under GWT but with a slightly different signature.
 *
 * <p>We can't use {@code PartiallyGwtIncompatible} because then the GWT compiler wouldn't recognize
 * it as a {@code GwtIncompatible} annotation. And for {@code Futures.catching}, we need the GWT
 * compiler to autostrip the normal server method in order to expose the special, inherited GWT
 * version.
 */

 * @since 12.0
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

  boolean iterateValuesAndGet(int reps) {
    Map<Element, Element> map = mapToTest;

    boolean dummy = false;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      for (Element key : map.values()) {
        // This normally wouldn't make sense, but because our keys are our values it kind of does
        Element value = map.get(key);
        dummy ^= key != value;
      }
    }
    return dummy;
  }

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

      super(message);
    }

    @Override
    public synchronized Throwable fillInStackTrace() {
      setStackTrace(new StackTraceElement[0]);
      return this; // no stack trace, wouldn't be useful anyway
    }
  }

  @Override
  @CheckForNull
  protected String pendingToString() {
    ListenableFuture<? extends V> localInputFuture = delegateRef;
    ScheduledFuture<?> localTimer = timer;

 * into TaskSegments. This class represents the execution context of one such task segment.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * Wise voices have suggested that maybe aggregators shouldn't be bound to the ordinary
 * lifecycle at all, in which case we wouldn't be needing this class at all ( and
 * ProjectBuildList.getByTaskSegments). Or maybe they should be introduced in the calculation
 * of the execution plan instead, which seems much nicer.

import java.util.List;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link Resources}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */

public class ResourcesTest extends IoTestCase {

  @AndroidIncompatible // wouldn't run anyway, but strip the source entirely because of b/230620681
  public static TestSuite suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    suite.addTest(
        ByteSourceTester.tests(

  }

  /**
   * Catches a bug where when constructing a service manager failed, later interactions with the
   * service could cause IllegalStateExceptions inside the partially constructed ServiceManager.
   * This ISE wouldn't actually bubble up but would get logged by ExecutionQueue. This obfuscated
   * the original error (which was not constructing ServiceManager correctly).
   */

            if (hashTable[(knownRunStart + maxRunBeforeFallback - 1) & mask] == null) {
              // There are only maxRunBeforeFallback - 1 elements between here and there,
              // so even if they were all nonnull, we wouldn't detect a hash flood.  Therefore,
              // we can skip them all.
              knownRunStart += maxRunBeforeFallback;
            } else {