Waiting in a hot tureen!
    Who for such dainties would not stoop?
    Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup!
    Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup!
        Beau--ootiful Soo--oop!
        Beau--ootiful Soo--oop!
    Soo--oop of the e--e--evening,
        Beautiful, beautiful Soup!

    `Beautiful Soup!  Who cares for fish,
    Game, or any other dish?
    Who would not give all else for two

   * return type is plain FilenameFilter. If we made such a change, then the annotation we choose
   * here would have no significance to end users, who would be forced to conform to the signature
   * used in FilenameFilter.)
   */
  @Override
  public boolean accept(File dir, String fileName) {
    return pattern.matcher(fileName).matches();
  }

 * </h4>
 *
 * <p>Users of {@code CompletableFuture} will likely want to continue using {@code
 * CompletableFuture}. {@code FluentFuture} is targeted at people who use {@code ListenableFuture},
 * who can't use Java 8, or who want an API more focused than {@code CompletableFuture}. (If you
 * need to adapt between {@code CompletableFuture} and {@code ListenableFuture}, consider <a

   * dependence on a type/method which GWT doesn't support, it is sufficient to simply reference the
   * unsupported type/method. E.g. "Class.isInstance".
   *
   * <p>As of Guava 20.0, this value is optional. We encourage authors who wish to describe why an
   * API is {@code @GwtIncompatible} to instead leave an implementation comment.
   */
  String value() default "";

                .compare(Boolean.TRUE, true)
                .compare(Boolean.TRUE, Boolean.TRUE)
                .result())
        .isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testDegenerate() {
    // kinda bogus, but who cares?
    assertThat(ComparisonChain.start().result()).isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testOneEqual() {
    assertThat(ComparisonChain.start().compare("a", "a").result()).isEqualTo(0);
  }

    Waiting in a hot tureen!
    Who for such dainties would not stoop?
    Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup!
    Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup!
        Beau--ootiful Soo--oop!
        Beau--ootiful Soo--oop!
    Soo--oop of the e--e--evening,
        Beautiful, beautiful Soup!

    `Beautiful Soup!  Who cares for fish,
    Game, or any other dish?
    Who would not give all else for two

   * dependence on a type/method which GWT doesn't support, it is sufficient to simply reference the
   * unsupported type/method. E.g. "Class.isInstance".
   *
   * <p>As of Guava 20.0, this value is optional. We encourage authors who wish to describe why an
   * API is {@code @GwtIncompatible} to instead leave an implementation comment.
   */
  String value() default "";

import com.google.common.annotations.Beta;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Supertype for {@link Graphs}, containing the old signatures of methods whose signatures we've
 * changed. This provides binary compatibility for users who compiled against the old signatures.
 */
@Beta
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
abstract class GraphsBridgeMethods {

  @SuppressWarnings("PreferredInterfaceType")

   *
   * But no matter what we do, it's worth remembering that the resulting code is going to be unsound
   * in the presence of LegacyConverter, at least in the case of users who view the converter as a
   * Function<A, B> or who call convertAll (and for any checkers that apply @PolyNull-like semantics
   * to Converter.convert). So maybe we don't want to think too hard about how to prevent our

   * on its instance of {@code TypeVariableImpl}. Otherwise it throws {@link
   * UnsupportedOperationException}; this should only apply to {@code getAnnotatedBounds()}. This
   * does mean that users on Java 8 who obtain an instance of {@code TypeVariable} from {@link
   * TypeResolver#resolveType} will not be able to call {@code getAnnotatedBounds()} on it, but that
   * should hopefully be rare.
   *