<version>4.0.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT</version>
  </parent>

  <artifactId>maven-api</artifactId>
  <packaging>pom</packaging>
  <name>Maven 4 API</name>
  <description>A new immutable API for Maven 4 to better manage what plugins and extensions can influence.</description>

  <modules>
    <module>maven-api-meta</module>
    <module>maven-api-di</module>
    <module>maven-api-xml</module>
    <module>maven-api-model</module>

            path. As the name suggests, this is similar to requiresDependencyResolution and supports the same values.
            The important difference is this will not resolve the files for the dependencies, i.e. the artifacts
            associated with a Maven project can lack a file. As such, this annotation is meant for Mojos that only

              <option value="$PROJECT_DIR$/js/js.translator/testData/out/codegen/wasmBox/$TEST_DATA_FILE$.wat" />
            </array>
          </value>
        </entry>
        <entry key="$PROJECT_DIR$/compiler/testData/codegen/boxInline">
          <value>
            <array>

            is then described by additional elements.
            Projects should only list the license(s) that applies to the project
            and not the licenses that apply to dependencies.
            If multiple licenses are listed, it is assumed that the user can select
            any of them, not that they must accept all.
            ]]>
          </description>
          <association>

          <type>String</type>
          <description>What the last version added to the directory is, including both releases and snapshots ("groupId/artifactId" directory only)</description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>release</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <type>String</type>

              <!-- END default constructor on Plexus/JSR 330 components -->
              <!-- system property with that name no longer evaluated -->
              <exclude>org.apache.maven.project.DefaultProjectBuilder#DISABLE_GLOBAL_MODEL_CACHE_SYSTEM_PROPERTY</exclude>

            tests themselves and not the code being tested that needs that access, though there's no
            obvious way to ensure that.

            We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
            the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
        -->
        <test.add.opens>

          <type>String</type>
          <description>
            Specifies that this profile will be activated when a matching JDK is detected.
          </description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>os</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <description>
            Specifies that this profile will be activated when matching OS attributes are detected.
          </description>

          <sourcepath>doesnotexist</sourcepath>
          <!-- Note that we do need to build Javadoc for *some* class. Otherwise, we get an empty Javadoc jar, which the Sonatype repository manager rejects. To avoid that, we've introduced a dummy class. But we made it package-private so that no one can depend on it. That in turn forced us to configure Javadoc to show package-private APIs. -->
          <show>package</show>

          </tags>

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>