</mailingList>
    <mailingList>
      <name>Maven User List</name>
      <subscribe>users******@****.***</subscribe>
      <unsubscribe>users******@****.***</unsubscribe>
      <post>users@maven.apache.org</post>
      <archive>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-users</archive>
      <otherArchives>
        <otherArchive>http://www.mail-archive.com/users@maven.apache.org/</otherArchive>

    </mailingList>
    <mailingList>
      <name>Maven User List</name>
      <subscribe>users******@****.***</subscribe>
      <unsubscribe>users******@****.***</unsubscribe>
      <post>users@maven.apache.org</post>
      <archive>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-users</archive>
      <otherArchives>
        <otherArchive>http://www.mail-archive.com/users@maven.apache.org/</otherArchive>

  <description>
    Test that plugin executions with the same id are merged during inheritance, especially executions using the
    default id, regardless whether the id is given explicitly by the user or implicitly assumed from defaults.
  </description>

  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.plugins</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-it-plugin-a</artifactId>

  <name>Guava InternalFutureFailureAccess and InternalFutures</name>
  <description>
    Contains
    com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal.InternalFutureFailureAccess and
    InternalFutures. Most users will never need to use this artifact. Its
    classes are conceptually a part of Guava, but they're in this separate
    artifact so that Android libraries can use them without pulling in all of

    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...

  <artifactId>test</artifactId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <packaging>jar</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4208</name>
  <description>
    Test that CLI properties specified by the user override project properties during interpolation.
  </description>

  <properties>
    <testProperty>FAILED</testProperty>
    <interpolatedProperty>${testProperty}</interpolatedProperty>
  </properties>

  <packaging>JAR</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4332</name>
  <description>
    Verify that default plugin executions contributed by the packaging are executed before user-defined
    executions from the POM's build section, regardless whether the executions are defined in the regular
    plugins section or the plugin management section.
  </description>

  <build>
    <pluginManagement>

    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
      <!-- *not* <scope>test</scope>; <scope>compile</scope> is right so that guava-testlib users get junit transitively. -->
      <version>4.13.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <!--
      Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
      -->

          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>
            <!-- We need local copies of some of these for 2 reasons: a User-Agent problem (https://stackoverflow.com/a/47891403/28465) and an SSL problem (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-507). If we choose to work around the User-Agent problem, we can go back to <links>, sidestepping the SSL problem. -->