}

  @Test
  @TestMetadata("any.kt")
  public void testAny() {
    runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/types/builtins/any.kt");
  }

  @Test
  @TestMetadata("anyWithoutBuiltins.kt")
  public void testAnyWithoutBuiltins() {
    runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/types/builtins/anyWithoutBuiltins.kt");
  }

    @Override
    public Collection<Type> provides() {
        return (Collection) types();
    }

    public Collection<DefaultType> types() {
        return Arrays.asList(
                // Maven types
                new DefaultType(Type.POM, Language.NONE, "pom", null, false),
                new DefaultType(Type.BOM, Language.NONE, "pom", null, false),

     * Otherwise, if the main artifact is placed on the module-path ({@value #JAR} or {@value #MODULAR_JAR} types),
     * then the test artifact will be added using {@code --patch-module} option.
     */
    String TEST_JAR = "test-jar";

    /**
     * Returns the dependency type id.
     * The id uniquely identifies this <i>dependency type</i>.
     *

    /**
     * Gets the class loader from which to load any types referenced by the configuration. If unset, the class loader of
     * the bean class will be used.
     *
     * @return The class loader to load referenced types from or {@code null} if unset.
     */
    ClassLoader getClassLoader();

    /**
     * Sets the class loader from which to load any types referenced by the configuration. If unset, the class loader of

 * The GWT supersource for this class contains a field for each type.
 *
 * <p>For details about this hack, see {@code GwtSerializationDependencies}, which takes the same
 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

 * ImmutableMultiset}. The GWT supersource for this class contains a field of type {@code E}.
 *
 * <p>For details about this hack, see {@code GwtSerializationDependencies}, which takes the same
 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 *

 *
 * <p>If you have an instance of one of the primary {@code common.graph} types ({@link Graph},
 * {@link ValueGraph}, and {@link Network}):
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }</pre>
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code PredecessorsFunction}. It will also work
 * with any other implementation of this interface.
 *

 *
 * <p>If you have an instance of one of the primary {@code common.graph} types ({@link Graph},
 * {@link ValueGraph}, and {@link Network}):
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }</pre>
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code SuccessorsFunction}. It will also work with
 * any other implementation of this interface.
 *

  @Param Result result;
  @Param ExceptionType exceptionType;
  /**
   * The number of other exception types in the cache of known-good exceptions and the number of
   * other {@code ClassValue} entries for the exception type to be tested. This lets us evaluate
   * whether our solution scales to use with multiple exception types and to whether it is affected

        @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // using raw types to avoid a bug in our nullness checker :(
        InternalEntry entry = map.getEntry(sample);
        if (entry != null) {
          Object canonical = entry.getKey();
          if (canonical != null) { // only matters if weak/soft keys are used
            // The compiler would know this is safe if not for our use of raw types (see above).
            @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")