...
```

But right at the moment Python compares the first `j` in `johndoe` to the first `s` in `stanleyjobson`, it will return `False`, because it already knows that those two strings are not the same, thinking that "there's no need to waste more computation comparing the rest of the letters". And your application will say "Incorrect username or password".

But then the attackers try with username `stanleyjobsox` and password `love123`.

```Python hl_lines="6  11"
{!../../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial003.py!}
```

Otherwise, the path for `/users/{user_id}` would match also for `/users/me`, "thinking" that it's receiving a parameter `user_id` with a value of `"me"`.

Similarly, you cannot redefine a path operation:

```Python hl_lines="6  11"
{!../../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial003b.py!}
```

trembling voice, `--and I hadn't begun my tea--not above a week
or so--and what with the bread-and-butter getting so thin--and
the twinkling of the tea--'

  `The twinkling of the what?' said the King.

  `It began with the tea,' the Hatter replied.

  `Of course twinkling begins with a T!' said the King sharply.
`Do you take me for a dunce?  Go on!'

  `I'm a poor man,' the Hatter went on, `and most things

trembling voice, `--and I hadn't begun my tea--not above a week
or so--and what with the bread-and-butter getting so thin--and
the twinkling of the tea--'

  `The twinkling of the what?' said the King.

  `It began with the tea,' the Hatter replied.

  `Of course twinkling begins with a T!' said the King sharply.
`Do you take me for a dunce?  Go on!'

  `I'm a poor man,' the Hatter went on, `and most things

Now, from a **developer's perspective**, here are several things to keep in mind while thinking about HTTPS:

* For HTTPS, **the server** needs to **have "certificates"** generated by a **third party**.
    * Those certificates are actually **acquired** from the third party, not "generated".

import "testing"

// If gcc is used, and linking internally, __mulsc3 and __muldc3
// will be linked in from libgcc which make several R_PPC64_TOC16_DS
// relocations which may not be resolvable with the internal linker.
func test8694(t *testing.T) { t.Skip("not supported on ppc64/ppc64le with internal linking") }

         * guarantee behavior in that case, anyway, and the current behavior is likely undesirable.
         * So that's either a reason to feel free to change it or a reason to not bother thinking
         * further about this.
         */
        V rightValue = uncheckedCastNullableTToT(onlyOnRight.remove(leftKey));
        if (valueEquivalence.equivalent(leftValue, rightValue)) {

	MOVQ R15, AX // ERROR "when dynamic linking, R15 is clobbered by a global variable access and is used here"
	RET
TEXT ·a8(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	ADDQ AX, R15 // ERROR "when dynamic linking, R15 is clobbered by a global variable access and is used here"
	RET
TEXT ·a9(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0

org.checkerframework.checker.signature
org.checkerframework.checker.signature.qual
org.checkerframework.checker.signedness
org.checkerframework.checker.signedness.qual
org.checkerframework.checker.tainting
org.checkerframework.checker.tainting.qual
org.checkerframework.checker.units
org.checkerframework.checker.units.qual
org.checkerframework.common.aliasing
org.checkerframework.common.aliasing.qual
org.checkerframework.common.basetype

org.checkerframework.checker.signature
org.checkerframework.checker.signature.qual
org.checkerframework.checker.signedness
org.checkerframework.checker.signedness.qual
org.checkerframework.checker.tainting
org.checkerframework.checker.tainting.qual
org.checkerframework.checker.units
org.checkerframework.checker.units.qual
org.checkerframework.common.aliasing
org.checkerframework.common.aliasing.qual
org.checkerframework.common.basetype