//   3. Signer whose configured minimum is longer than the requested duration
  //
  // The minimum valid value for expirationSeconds is 600, i.e. 10 minutes.
  //
  // +optional
  optional int32 expirationSeconds = 8;

  // allowedUsages specifies a set of usage contexts the key will be
  // valid for.
  // See:
  // 	https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-4.2.1.3

// used rather than just deleting the webhook since we want to keep it around after changing the default so user can later
// switch back to it. This is a hack but it is meant to cover a corner case where a user wants to migrate from a non-revisioned
// old version and then later decides to switch back to the old revision again.

     means

     a. that the initial Contributor has attached the notice described in
        Exhibit B to the Covered Software; or

     b. that the Covered Software was made available under the terms of version
        1.1 or earlier of the License, but not also under the terms of a
        Secondary License.

1.6. “Executable Form”

     means any form of the work other than Source Code Form.

1.7. “Larger Work”

     means

     a. that the initial Contributor has attached the notice described in
        Exhibit B to the Covered Software; or

     b. that the Covered Software was made available under the terms of version
        1.1 or earlier of the License, but not also under the terms of a
        Secondary License.

1.6. “Executable Form”

     means any form of the work other than Source Code Form.

1.7. “Larger Work”

     means

     a. that the initial Contributor has attached the notice described in
        Exhibit B to the Covered Software; or

     b. that the Covered Software was made available under the terms of
        version 1.1 or earlier of the License, but not also under the terms of
        a Secondary License.

1.6. "Executable Form"

     means any form of the work other than Source Code Form.

1.7. "Larger Work"

			},
			expectPodUID:      "",
			expectContainerID: "45490e76e0878aaa4d9808f7d2eefba37f093c3efbba9838b6d8ab804d9bd814",
		},
		{
			name: "more than one container ID in cgroups",
			cgroupPaths: []string{
				"/user.slice",
				"/kubepods/pod2c48913c-b29f-11e7-9350-020968147796/9bca8d63d5fa610783847915bcff0ecac1273e5b4bed3f6fa1b07350e0135961",

  // rely on the server to generate the name.  If that is the case, this field will contain an empty string.
  // +optional
  optional string name = 5;

  // Namespace is the namespace associated with the request (if any).
  // +optional
  optional string namespace = 6;

  // Operation is the operation being performed. This may be different than the operation

  // receive when they have the name of this class in their pod spec.
  optional int32 value = 2;

  // globalDefault specifies whether this PriorityClass should be considered as
  // the default priority for pods that do not have any priority class.
  // Only one PriorityClass can be marked as `globalDefault`. However, if more than

Helm charts `values.yaml` represent a complex user facing API that tends to grow uncontrollably over time
due to design choices in Helm.
The underlying Kubernetes resources we configure have 1000s of fields; given enough users and bespoke use cases,
eventually someone will want to customize every one of those fields.
If all fields are exposed in `values.yaml`, we end up with an massive API that is also likely worse than just using the Kubernetes API directly.

Ztunnel was not designed to be a feature-rich data plane.
Quite the opposite - an *aggressively* small feature set is the key feature that makes ztunnel viable.
It very intentionally does not offer L7 (HTTP) functionality, for instance, which would likely violate some of the goals above, without contributing to them.