* com.google.common.testing.junit3.TearDownTestCase} and {@code
   * com.google.common.testing.junit4.TearDownTestCase} for example.
   *
   * <p>A failing {@link TearDown} may or may not fail a tl4j test, depending on the version of
   * JUnit test case you are running under. To avoid failing in the face of an exception regardless
   * of JUnit version, implement a {@link SloppyTearDown} instead.
   *

          + "so it cannot be reused to connect the following nodes: %s.";
  static final String MULTIPLE_EDGES_CONNECTING =
      "Cannot call edgeConnecting() when parallel edges exist between %s and %s. Consider calling "
          + "edgesConnecting() instead.";
  static final String PARALLEL_EDGES_NOT_ALLOWED =
      "Nodes %s and %s are already connected by a different edge. To construct a graph "

   *     cause. At the moment, you can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit
   *     {@code null} cause. Note, however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents
   *     anyone from calling {@link #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a
   *     constructor that omits the cause.
   */
  @Deprecated
  protected UncheckedExecutionException() {}

  /**

  }

  public void testAddAfterRun() throws Exception {
    // Run the previous test
    testRunOnPopulatedList();

    // If it passed, then verify an Add will be executed without calling run
    CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
    list.add(new MockRunnable(countDownLatch), Executors.newCachedThreadPool());
    assertTrue(countDownLatch.await(1L, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
  }

/**
 * Based on what a {@link Type} is, dispatch it to the corresponding {@code visit*} method. By
 * default, no recursion is done for type arguments or type bounds. But subclasses can opt to do
 * recursion by calling {@link #visit} for any {@code Type} while visitation is in progress. For
 * example, this can be used to reject wildcards or type variables contained in a type as in:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * new TypeVisitor() {

    if (digits == 0) {
      return new BigInteger(1, RANDOM_SOURCE);
    } else {
      return new BigInteger(digits, RANDOM_SOURCE).setBit(digits);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Equivalent to calling randomPositiveBigInteger(numBits) and then flipping the sign with 50%
   * probability.
   */
  static BigInteger randomNonZeroBigInteger(int numBits) {
    BigInteger result = randomPositiveBigInteger(numBits);

        return new ImmutableEnumSet<>(set);
    }
  }

  /*
   * Notes on EnumSet and <E extends Enum<E>>:
   *
   * This class isn't an arbitrary ForwardingImmutableSet because we need to
   * know that calling {@code clone()} during deserialization will return an
   * object that no one else has a reference to, allowing us to guarantee
   * immutability. Hence, we support only {@link EnumSet}.
   */

    private int crc2 = 0;
    private int crc3 = 0;

    @Override
    protected void process(ByteBuffer bb) {
      if (finished) {
        throw new IllegalStateException(
            "The behavior of calling any method after calling hash() is undefined.");
      }
      while (bb.remaining() >= 16) {
        crc0 = computeForWord(crc0);
        crc1 = computeForWord(crc1);
        crc2 = computeForWord(crc2);

   * useful to call from vanilla JavaScript because it returns an instance of Class, which can't be
   * converted to a standard JavaScript type. (Contrast to something like String or boolean.) Since
   * we're not calling it from JavaScript, we suppress the warning.
   */
  @JsMethod
  @SuppressWarnings("unusable-by-js")
  private static native <E extends Enum<E>> @Nullable Class<E> getDeclaringClassOrNullForJ2cl(
      E e) /*-{

      multimap().putAll(k3(), Lists.newArrayList(null, v3()));
      fail();
    } catch (NullPointerException expected) {
    }

    /*
     * In principle, a Multimap implementation could add e3 first before failing on the null. But
     * that seems unlikely enough to be worth complicating the test over, especially if there's any
     * chance that a permissive test could mask a bug.
     */
    expectUnchanged();