private static sun.misc.Unsafe getUnsafe() {
      try {
        return sun.misc.Unsafe.getUnsafe();
      } catch (SecurityException tryReflectionInstead) {
      }
      try {
        return java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(
            new java.security.PrivilegedExceptionAction<sun.misc.Unsafe>() {
              @Override
              public sun.misc.Unsafe run() throws Exception {

  /**
   * Returns the JavaLangAccess class that is present in all Sun JDKs. It is not allowed in
   * AppEngine, and not present in non-Sun JDKs.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/318391980
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // java.lang.reflect
  @CheckForNull
  private static Object getJLA() {
    try {
      /*
       * We load sun.misc.* classes using reflection since Android doesn't support these classes and

  /**
   * Returns the JavaLangAccess class that is present in all Sun JDKs. It is not allowed in
   * AppEngine, and not present in non-Sun JDKs.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/318391980
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // java.lang.reflect
  @CheckForNull
  private static Object getJLA() {
    try {
      /*
       * We load sun.misc.* classes using reflection since Android doesn't support these classes and

   * Cache.asMap().putIfAbsent} after loading has completed; if another value was associated with
   * {@code key} while the new value was loading then a removal notification will be sent for the
   * new value.
   *
   * <p>If the cache loader associated with this cache is known not to throw checked exceptions,
   * then prefer {@link #getUnchecked} over this method.
   *

          <excludePackageNames>
            com.azul.tooling.in,com.google.common.base.internal,com.google.common.base.internal.*,com.google.thirdparty.publicsuffix,com.google.thirdparty.publicsuffix.*,com.oracle.*,com.sun.*,java.*,javax.*,jdk,jdk.*,org.*,sun.*
          </excludePackageNames>
          <!-- Ignore some tags that are found in Java 11 sources but not recognized... under -source 8, I think it was? I can no longer reproduce the failure. -->

   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testPutAll_nullKeyUnsupported()} so that tests
   * can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5045147">Sun bug 5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getPutAllNullKeyUnsupportedMethod() {

import javax.crypto.Mac;
import javax.crypto.SecretKey;
import javax.crypto.spec.SecretKeySpec;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;
import sun.security.jca.ProviderList;
import sun.security.jca.Providers;

/**
 * Tests for the MacHashFunction.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class MacHashFunctionTest extends TestCase {

   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testAddAll_nullUnsupported()} so that tests can
   * suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5045147">Sun bug 5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddAllNullUnsupportedMethod() {

    assertEquals("Eviction notifications must be received", 10, removalListener.getCount());

    CacheTesting.expireEntries((LoadingCache<?, ?>) cache, EXPIRING_TIME, ticker);
    // ensure that no new notifications are sent
    assertEquals("Eviction notifications must be received", 10, removalListener.getCount());
  }

  public void testExpiringGet_expireAfterWrite() {
    FakeTicker ticker = new FakeTicker();

 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even
 *       <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one
 *       that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source