throw new AssertionError("this statement should be unreachable");
    }

    @Override
    BoundType typeAsUpperBound() {
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }

    @Override
    Cut<Comparable<?>> withLowerBoundType(
        BoundType boundType, DiscreteDomain<Comparable<?>> domain) {
      throw new AssertionError("this statement should be unreachable");
    }

    @Override

      throw new AssertionError("this statement should be unreachable");
    }

    @Override
    BoundType typeAsUpperBound() {
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }

    @Override
    Cut<Comparable<?>> withLowerBoundType(
        BoundType boundType, DiscreteDomain<Comparable<?>> domain) {
      throw new AssertionError("this statement should be unreachable");
    }

    @Override

      for (int l = nextPermutation.size() - 1; l > j; l--) {
        if (comparator.compare(ak, nextPermutation.get(l)) < 0) {
          return l;
        }
      }
      throw new AssertionError("this statement should be unreachable");
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@link Collection} of all the permutations of the specified {@link Collection}.
   *

      for (int l = nextPermutation.size() - 1; l > j; l--) {
        if (comparator.compare(ak, nextPermutation.get(l)) < 0) {
          return l;
        }
      }
      throw new AssertionError("this statement should be unreachable");
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@link Collection} of all the permutations of the specified {@link Collection}.
   *

 * {@linkplain #close closed}. This is intended to approximately emulate the behavior of Java 7's <a
 * href="http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html"
 * >try-with-resources</a> statement in JDK6-compatible code. Running on Java 7, code using this
 * should be approximately equivalent in behavior to the same code written with try-with-resources.

    assertTrue(Iterables.elementsEqual(LegacyComparable.VALUES_FORWARD, set));
  }

  public void testLegacyComparable_builder_natural() {
    // Note: IntelliJ wrongly reports an error for this statement
    ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<LegacyComparable> builder =
        ImmutableSortedSet.<LegacyComparable>naturalOrder();

    builder.addAll(LegacyComparable.VALUES_BACKWARD);
    builder.add(LegacyComparable.X);

   * simply use the standard method-chaining idiom, as illustrated in the documentation at top,
   * configuring a {@code CacheBuilder} and building your {@link Cache} all in a single statement.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> if you ignore the above advice, and use this {@code CacheBuilder} to build a
   * cache whose key or value type is incompatible with the weigher, you will likely experience a

   *
   * <p>This method always throws an exception. The {@code RuntimeException} return type allows
   * client code to signal to the compiler that statements after the call are unreachable. Example
   * usage:
   *
   * <pre>
   * T doSomething() {
   *   try {
   *     return someMethodThatCouldThrowAnything();
   *   } catch (IKnowWhatToDoWithThisException e) {

   *
   * <p>This method always throws an exception. The {@code RuntimeException} return type allows
   * client code to signal to the compiler that statements after the call are unreachable. Example
   * usage:
   *
   * <pre>
   * T doSomething() {
   *   try {
   *     return someMethodThatCouldThrowAnything();
   *   } catch (IKnowWhatToDoWithThisException e) {

    assertTrue(Iterables.elementsEqual(LegacyComparable.VALUES_FORWARD, set));
  }

  public void testLegacyComparable_builder_natural() {
    // Note: IntelliJ wrongly reports an error for this statement
    ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<LegacyComparable> builder =
        ImmutableSortedSet.<LegacyComparable>naturalOrder();

    builder.addAll(LegacyComparable.VALUES_BACKWARD);
    builder.add(LegacyComparable.X);