- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 1 - 10 of 345 for starlette (0.28 sec)
-
docs/ko/docs/benchmarks.md
* **Starlette**: * Uvicorn 다음으로 좋은 성능을 발휘합니다. 사실 Starlette는 Uvicorn을 사용하여 실행됩니다. 따라서 더 많은 코드를 실행해야 하기 때문에 Uvicorn보다 "느려질" 수밖에 없습니다. * 하지만 경로 기반 라우팅 등 간단한 웹 응용 프로그램을 구축할 수 있는 도구를 제공합니다. * Starlette를 비교할 때는 Sanic, Flask, Django 등의 웹 프레임워크(또는 마이크로 프레임워크)와 비교하세요. * **FastAPI**: * Starlette가 Uvicorn을 사용하므로 Uvicorn보다 빨라질 수 없는 것과 마찬가지로, **FastAPI**는 Starlette를 사용하므로 더 빠를 수 없습니다.Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Oct 27 15:01:38 UTC 2024 - 4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/tr/docs/benchmarks.md
Özellikle, (diğer birçok araç arasında) Uvicorn, Starlette ve FastAPI'ın birlikte karşılaştırıldığını görebilirsiniz. Aracın çözdüğü problem ne kadar basitse, performansı o kadar iyi olacaktır. Ancak kıyaslamaların çoğu, aracın sağladığı ek özellikleri test etmez. Hiyerarşi şöyledir: * **Uvicorn**: bir ASGI sunucusu * **Starlette**: (Uvicorn'u kullanır) bir web mikroframeworkü
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Jan 23 14:10:30 UTC 2024 - 3.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/ru/docs/tutorial/handling-errors.md
Таким образом, вы можете продолжать вызывать `HTTPException` от **FastAPI** как обычно в своем коде. Но когда вы регистрируете обработчик исключений, вы должны зарегистрировать его для `HTTPException` от Starlette.
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 20:41:43 UTC 2025 - 14.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/de/docs/tutorial/handling-errors.md
Sie können also weiterhin die `HTTPException` von **FastAPI** wie üblich in Ihrem Code auslösen. Aber wenn Sie einen Exceptionhandler registrieren, sollten Sie ihn für die `HTTPException` von Starlette registrieren.
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 20:41:43 UTC 2025 - 10.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/es/docs/tutorial/handling-errors.md
Así que puedes seguir lanzando un `HTTPException` de **FastAPI** como de costumbre en tu código. Pero cuando registras un manejador de excepciones, deberías registrarlo para el `HTTPException` de Starlette.
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 20:41:43 UTC 2025 - 9.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/pt/docs/tutorial/handling-errors.md
``` /// note | Detalhes Técnicos Você também pode usar `from starlette.requests import Request` e `from starlette.responses import JSONResponse`. **FastAPI** disponibiliza o mesmo `starlette.responses` através do `fastapi.responses` por conveniência ao desenvolvedor. Contudo, a maior parte das respostas disponíveis vem diretamente do Starlette. O mesmo acontece com o `Request`. ///
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 20:41:43 UTC 2025 - 10.2K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/tutorial/handling-errors.md
But when you register an exception handler, you should register it for Starlette's `HTTPException`. This way, if any part of Starlette's internal code, or a Starlette extension or plug-in, raises a Starlette `HTTPException`, your handler will be able to catch and handle it. In this example, to be able to have both `HTTPException`s in the same code, Starlette's exceptions is renamed to `StarletteHTTPException`: ```Python
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 20:41:43 UTC 2025 - 9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/es/docs/benchmarks.md
* Si estás comparando Starlette, compáralo con Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Frameworks web (o microframeworks). * **FastAPI**: * De la misma forma en que Starlette usa Uvicorn y no puede ser más rápido que él, **FastAPI** usa Starlette, por lo que no puede ser más rápido que él.
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Dec 16 16:33:45 UTC 2025 - 3.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/ru/docs/benchmarks.md
* Зато он предоставляет Вам инструменты для создания простых веб‑приложений с маршрутизацией по путям и т. п. * Если Вы сравниваете Starlette, сравнивайте его с Sanic, Flask, Django и т. д. — веб‑фреймворками (или микрофреймворками). * **FastAPI**:Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Sep 30 11:24:39 UTC 2025 - 6.3K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/fr/docs/benchmarks.md
* **Starlette** : * A les seconde meilleures performances après Uvicorn. Starlette utilise en réalité Uvicorn. De ce fait, il ne peut qu’être plus "lent" qu'Uvicorn car il requiert l'exécution de plus de code. * Cependant il nous apporte les outils pour construire une application web simple, avec un routage basé sur des chemins, etc.Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Jul 27 18:49:56 UTC 2023 - 3.9K bytes - Viewed (0)