id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: input
    id: page
    attributes:
      label: Page with the problem

Should and should not do's.

## Error messages and suggestions

Traditionally, if an error occurred, the error message and the possible solution were provided to the console via a single String in the corresponding exception.
That meant possible solutions for Problems could be scattered all over the console output.
To improve the user experience, we introduced a new way to provide suggestions.

    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:

    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: steps-to-reproduce
    attributes:
      label: Steps to Reproduce
      description: |

* To provide best practices and solutions we (as *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.
* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.
The goal is not to *own* a decision, but to *share* it with other teams, and improve the build tool together.

* To provide best practices and solutions we (as the *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.
* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now, and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.
The goal is not to *own* a decision, but to *share* it with other teams, and improve the build tool together.

    attributes:
      label: Context
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? What other alternatives have you considered?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:

    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: steps-to-reproduce
    attributes:
      label: Steps to Reproduce
      description: |

      env:
        # Set the DEVELOCITY_ACCESS_KEY so that Gradle Build Scans are generated
        DEVELOCITY_ACCESS_KEY: ${{ secrets.GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_ACCESS_KEY }}
        # Potential stop-gap solution for ReadTimeout issues with the Gradle Build Cache
        # https://gradle.slack.com/archives/CHDLT99C6/p1636477584059200
        GRADLE_OPTS: -Dhttp.keepAlive=false

    - name: Compile with Gradle without Build Scan

Java serialization is one way to implement this, however, despite its simplicity of implementation, it has several drawbacks:

- **Performance:** Java's built-in serialization mechanism is often slower compared to other serialization solutions. This is due to Java's use of reflection and the need to maintain a lot of metadata.

- **Size of Serialized Data:** Java serialization tends to produce larger serialized objects because it includes class metadata and other overhead.