@Override
          protected char[] escapeUnsafe(char c) {
            return ("{" + c + "}").toCharArray();
          }
        };
    EscaperAsserts.assertBasic(wrappingEscaper);
    // '[' and '@' lie either side of [A-Z].
    assertEquals("{[}FOO{@}BAR{]}", wrappingEscaper.escape("[FOO@BAR]"));
  }

  public void testSafeRange_maxLessThanMin() throws IOException {
    // Basic escaping of unsafe chars (wrap them in {,}'s)

       * instance.
       */
      super("");
    }

    @Override
    Comparable<?> endpoint() {
      throw new IllegalStateException("range unbounded on this side");
    }

    @Override
    boolean isLessThan(Comparable<?> value) {
      return true;
    }

    @Override
    BoundType typeAsLowerBound() {
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }

   * class documentation above). This method is <i>generally expected</i>, but not absolutely
   * required, to have the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Its execution does not cause any observable side effects.
   *   <li>The computation is <i>consistent with equals</i>; that is, {@link Objects#equal
   *       Objects.equal}{@code (a, b)} implies that {@code predicate.apply(a) ==
   *       predicate.apply(b))}.
   * </ul>

   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *

      int[] quotients = new int[indexes.length];
      int[] remainders = new int[indexes.length];
      // The indexes to select. In the worst case, we'll need one each side of each quantile.
      int[] requiredSelections = new int[indexes.length * 2];
      int requiredSelectionsCount = 0;
      for (int i = 0; i < indexes.length; i++) {

          @Override
          protected char[] escapeUnsafe(char c) {
            return ("{" + c + "}").toCharArray();
          }
        };
    EscaperAsserts.assertBasic(wrappingEscaper);
    // '[' and '@' lie either side of [A-Z].
    assertEquals("{[}FOO{@}BAR{]}", wrappingEscaper.escape("[FOO@BAR]"));
  }

  public void testSafeRange_maxLessThanMin() throws IOException {
    // Basic escaping of unsafe chars (wrap them in {,}'s)

   * class documentation above). This method is <i>generally expected</i>, but not absolutely
   * required, to have the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Its execution does not cause any observable side effects.
   *   <li>The computation is <i>consistent with equals</i>; that is, {@link Objects#equal
   *       Objects.equal}{@code (a, b)} implies that {@code predicate.apply(a) ==
   *       predicate.apply(b))}.
   * </ul>

   *     then this is not logically a {@code Converter} at all, and should just implement {@link
   *     Function}.
   */
  @ForOverride
  protected abstract A doBackward(B b);

  // API (consumer-side) methods

  /**
   * Returns a representation of {@code a} as an instance of type {@code B}.
   *
   * @return the converted value; is null <i>if and only if</i> {@code a} is null
   */
  @CheckForNull

  private void readMoreChars() throws IOException {
    // Possibilities:
    // 1) array has space available on right-hand side (between limit and capacity)
    // 2) array has space available on left-hand side (before position)
    // 3) array has no space available
    //
    // In case 2 we shift the existing chars to the left, and in case 3 we create a bigger

          protected char[] escapeUnsafe(int c) {
            return ("{" + (char) c + "}").toCharArray();
          }
        };
    EscaperAsserts.assertBasic(wrappingEscaper);
    // '[' and '@' lie either side of [A-Z].
    assertEquals("{[}FOO{@}BAR{]}", wrappingEscaper.escape("[FOO@BAR]"));
  }

  public void testDeleteUnsafeChars() throws IOException {
    UnicodeEscaper deletingEscaper =