direction in which the March Hare was said to live.  `I've seen
hatters before,' she said to herself; `the March Hare will be
much the most interesting, and perhaps as this is May it won't be
raving mad--at least not so mad as it was in March.'  As she said
this, she looked up, and there was the Cat again, sitting on a
branch of a tree.

  `Did you say pig, or fig?' said the Cat.

  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I
   * see calls in Google code that pass a null `dir` to a FilenameFilter.... So let's declare the
   * parameter as non-nullable (since passing null to a FilenameFilter is unsafe in general), but if

    public static void staticOneArgCheckForNullThrowsNPE(@javax.annotation.CheckForNull String s) {
      checkNotNull(s); // doesn't check if you said you'd accept null, but you don't
    }

    public static void staticOneArgNullableThrowsNPE(@Nullable String s) {
      checkNotNull(s); // doesn't check if you said you'd accept null, but you don't
    }

    public void oneArgCorrectlyThrowsNpe(String s) {

      return;
    }
    fail("Should get equal to incompatible class error");
  }

  /** Test proper handling where an object is not equal to one the user has said should be equal */
  public void testInvalidNotEqualsEqualObject() {
    equalsTester.addEqualityGroup(reference, notEqualObject1);
    try {
      equalsTester.testEquals();
    } catch (AssertionFailedError e) {

 * (no "hangs" due to incorrect use of {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition#signal
 * Condition.signal}).
 *
 * <p>A thread is said to <i>occupy</i> a monitor if it has <i>entered</i> the monitor but not yet
 * <i>left</i>. Only one thread may occupy a given monitor at any moment. A monitor is also

    return createFromEntries(entries);
  }

  public abstract Set<Entry<K, V>> createFromEntries(Entry<K, V>[] entries);

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // generic arrays make typesafety sad
  public Entry<K, V>[] createArray(int length) {
    return (Entry<K, V>[]) new Entry<?, ?>[length];
  }

  /** Returns the original element list, unchanged. */
  @Override

 * An immutable object that may contain a non-null reference to another object. Each instance of
 * this type either contains a non-null reference, or contains nothing (in which case we say that
 * the reference is "absent"); it is never said to "contain {@code null}".
 *
 * <p>A non-null {@code Optional<T>} reference can be used as a replacement for a nullable {@code T}
 * reference. It allows you to represent "a {@code T} that must be present" and a "a {@code T} that

     * behavior, so it knows that `convert(a)` returns a non-nullable value, and we don't need to
     * perform even a cast, much less a runtime check.
     *
     * All that said, don't forget that everyone should call converter.convert() instead of
     * converter.apply(), anyway. If clients use only converter.convert(), then their nullness

     * determined experimentally to match our desired probability of false positives.
     */
    // NB: yes, this is surprisingly high, but that's what the experiments said was necessary
    // Raising this number slows the worst-case contains behavior, speeds up hashFloodingDetected,
    // and reduces the false-positive probability.
    static final int MAX_RUN_MULTIPLIER = 13;

    /**

  private static final int DEFAULT_CAPACITY = 11;

  @VisibleForTesting
  static int initialQueueSize(
      int configuredExpectedSize, int maximumSize, Iterable<?> initialContents) {
    // Start with what they said, if they said it, otherwise DEFAULT_CAPACITY
    int result =
        (configuredExpectedSize == Builder.UNSET_EXPECTED_SIZE)
            ? DEFAULT_CAPACITY
            : configuredExpectedSize;