* otherwise sorting a list of ComparableVersions() will in some cases throw runtime exception;
     * see Netbeans issues <a href="https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240845">240845</a> and
     * <a href="https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226100">226100</a>
     */
    @Test
    void testMng5568() {
        String a = "6.1.0";
        String b = "6.1.0rc3";

                    addFileParameter(item);
                }
            }
        }
    }

    protected void showFieldLoggingTitle() {
        // logging filter cannot show the parameters when multi-part so logging here
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
            logger.debug("[Multipart Request Parameter]");
        }
    }

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests relating to cache expiration: make sure entries expire at the right times, make sure
 * expired entries don't show up, etc.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation") // tests of deprecated method
public class CacheExpirationTest extends TestCase {

  private static final long EXPIRING_TIME = 1000;

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests relating to cache expiration: make sure entries expire at the right times, make sure
 * expired entries don't show up, etc.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation") // tests of deprecated method
public class CacheExpirationTest extends TestCase {

  private static final long EXPIRING_TIME = 1000;

     */
    String getMailSmtpServerMainHostAndPort();

    /**
     * Get the value for the key 'mail.subject.test.prefix'. <br>
     * The value is, e.g. [Test] <br>
     * comment: The prefix of subject to show test environment or not
     * @return The value of found property. (NotNull: if not found, exception but basically no way)
     */
    String getMailSubjectTestPrefix();

    /**

 * weak references.
 *
 * <p><strong>Performance</strong>
 *
 * <p>The extra bookkeeping done by cycle detecting locks comes at some cost to performance.
 * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as
 *       opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.

     * constructor's. This is an arbitrary rule since no existing language spec mandates one way or
     * the other. From the declaration syntax, the class type parameter appears first, but the call
     * syntax may show up in opposite order such as {@code new <A>Foo<B>()}.
     */
    @Override
    public final TypeVariable<?>[] getTypeParameters() {
      TypeVariable<?>[] declaredByClass = getDeclaringClass().getTypeParameters();

 *   }
 * } else {
 *   // do other things since the monitor was not available
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h2>Comparison with {@code synchronized} and {@code ReentrantLock}</h2>
 *
 * <p>The following examples show a simple threadsafe holder expressed using {@code synchronized},
 * {@link ReentrantLock}, and {@code Monitor}.
 *
 * <h3>{@code synchronized}</h3>
 *

        blocker = (Blocker) state;
      }
      spinCount++;
      if (spinCount > MAX_BUSY_WAIT_SPINS) {
        /*
         * If we have spun a lot, just park ourselves. This will save CPU while we wait for a slow
         * interrupting thread. In theory, interruptTask() should be very fast, but due to
         * InterruptibleChannel and JavaLangAccess.blockedOn(Thread, Interruptible), it isn't

   *       </ol>
   *       Given all these possibilities, it is frequently possible for listeners to execute in UI
   *       threads, RPC network threads, or other latency-sensitive threads. In those cases, slow
   *       listeners can harm responsiveness, slow the system as a whole, or worse. (See also the
   *       note about locking below.)
   *   <li>If many tasks will be triggered by the same event, one heavyweight task may delay other