<artifactId>test</artifactId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <packaging>jar</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4193</name>
  <description>
    Test that multiple artifact repository declarations with the same id cause a validation error even if the
    repositories are defined within a (non-active) profile.
  </description>

  <profiles>
    <profile>
      <id>test</id>
      <repositories>
        <repository>

    <version>0.1</version>
  </parent>

  <artifactId>child</artifactId>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-3938</name>
  <description>
    Test that plugin executions with the same id are merged during inheritance, especially executions using the
    default id, regardless whether the id is given explicitly by the user or implicitly assumed from defaults.
  </description>

  <build>
    <plugins>

  <artifactId>parent</artifactId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <packaging>pom</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-3925</name>
  <description>
    Test that plugin executions (in the same phase) are properly ordered after inheritance/merge with
    parent executions.
  </description>

  <build>
    <!-- This project uses plugin management for the test plugin -->
    <pluginManagement>
      <plugins>

  <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.mng3821</groupId>
  <artifactId>test</artifactId>
  <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-3821</name>
  <description>
    Verify that using the same id for executions/reportsets of different plugins doesn't blow up the project builder.
  </description>

  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.plugins</groupId>

public class MavenExecutionPlan implements Iterable<ExecutionPlanItem> {

    /*
      At the moment, this class is totally immutable, and this is in line with thoughts about the
      pre-calculated execution plan that stays the same during the execution.

      If deciding to add mutable state to this class, it should be at least considered to
      separate this into a separate mutable structure.

    */

 * <tr><td><code>project.*</code></td>         <td></td>               <td></td></tr>
 * <tr><td><code>pom.*</code></td>             <td>(since Maven 3)</td><td>same as <code>project.*</code></td></tr>
 * <tr><td><code>executedProject</code></td>   <td></td>
 *                                             <td>{@link MavenProject#getExecutionProject()}</td></tr>

/**
 * A container for data that is specific to a session.
 * All components may use this storage to associate arbitrary data with a session.
 * <p>
 * Unlike a cache, this session data is not subject to purging. For this same reason, session data should also not be
 * abused as a cache (i.e. for storing values that can be re-calculated) to avoid memory exhaustion.
 * <p>
 * <strong>Note:</strong> Actual implementations must be thread-safe.
 *

  Push your changes to a topic branch in your fork of the repository.
+ Make commits of logical units.
+ Respect the original code style: by using the same [codestyle][code-style],
  patches should only highlight the actual difference, not being disturbed by any formatting issues:
  + Only use spaces for indentation.

            see <a href="../maven-core/artifact-handlers.html">default artifact handlers</a> for a list,</li>
            <li>distinguishing two artifacts
            that belong to the same POM but were built differently.
            For example, {@code jdk14} and {@code jdk15}.</li>
            </ul>
            ]]>
          </description>
          <type>String</type>

        assertSame(range, VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec("[1.0,1.2]")); // same instance from spec cache

        VersionRange spec = VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec("1.0");
        assertSame(spec, VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec("1.0")); // same instance from spec cache
        List<Restriction> restrictions = spec.getRestrictions();