angrily.

  `It wasn't very civil of you to sit down without being
invited,' said the March Hare.

  `I didn't know it was YOUR table,' said Alice; `it's laid for a
great many more than three.'

  `Your hair wants cutting,' said the Hatter.  He had been
looking at Alice for some time with great curiosity, and this was
his first speech.

  `You should learn not to make personal remarks,' Alice said

  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I
   * see calls in Google code that pass a null `dir` to a FilenameFilter.... So let's declare the
   * parameter as non-nullable (since passing null to a FilenameFilter is unsafe in general), but if

    }

    public static void staticOneArgCheckForNullThrowsNpe(@CheckForNull String s) {
      checkNotNull(s); // doesn't check if you said you'd accept null, but you don't
    }

    public static void staticOneArgNullableThrowsNpe(@Nullable String s) {
      checkNotNull(s); // doesn't check if you said you'd accept null, but you don't
    }

    public void oneArgCorrectlyThrowsNpe(String s) {

      return;
    }
    fail("Should get equal to incompatible class error");
  }

  /** Test proper handling where an object is not equal to one the user has said should be equal */
  public void testInvalidNotEqualsEqualObject() {
    equalsTester.addEqualityGroup(reference, notEqualObject1);
    try {
      equalsTester.testEquals();
    } catch (AssertionFailedError e) {

     * call, so we can't assume that writes to the Entry have been safely published by some other
     * synchronization actions.)
     *
     * All that said: I haven't actually managed to make this particular test produce a TSAN error
     * for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,

   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would

   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would

   * result in more-than-ideal collisions for a non-uniformly distributed key space. In practice,
   * most key spaces are ANYTHING BUT uniformly distributed. A bit(i) in the input is said to
   * 'affect' a bit(j) in the output if two inputs, identical but for bit(i), will differ at output
   * bit(j) about half the time
   *

         * However, we don't expose currentFuture to users, so they can't attach listeners. And the
         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's

     * behavior, so it knows that `convert(a)` returns a non-nullable value, and we don't need to
     * perform even a cast, much less a runtime check.
     *
     * All that said, don't forget that everyone should call converter.convert() instead of
     * converter.apply(), anyway. If clients use only converter.convert(), then their nullness