// (We're relying on callers to call this method only with an edge that's in the graph.)
    return requireNonNull(outEdgeMap.get(edge));
  }

  @Override
  public N removeInEdge(E edge, boolean isSelfLoop) {
    if (isSelfLoop) {
      checkNonNegative(--selfLoopCount);
    }
    N previousNode = inEdgeMap.remove(edge);

  public Set<E> inEdges() {
    return incidentEdges();
  }

  @Override
  public Set<E> outEdges() {
    return incidentEdges();
  }

  @Override
  public N adjacentNode(E edge) {
    // We're relying on callers to call this method only with an edge that's in the graph.
    return requireNonNull(incidentEdgeMap.get(edge));
  }

  @Override
  public @Nullable N removeInEdge(E edge, boolean isSelfLoop) {

  public Set<E> inEdges() {
    return incidentEdges();
  }

  @Override
  public Set<E> outEdges() {
    return incidentEdges();
  }

  @Override
  public N adjacentNode(E edge) {
    // We're relying on callers to call this method only with an edge that's in the graph.
    return requireNonNull(incidentEdgeMap.get(edge));
  }

  @Override
  public @Nullable N removeInEdge(E edge, boolean isSelfLoop) {

projects with which your application integrates or interacts. We understand that AGPLv3 licensing is complex and nuanced. It is for that reason we strongly encourage using experts in licensing to make any such determinations around compliance instead of relying on apocryphal or anecdotal advice.

[MinIO Commercial Licensing](https://min.io/pricing) is the best option for applications that trigger AGPLv3 obligations (e.g. open sourcing your application). Applications using MinIO - or any other OSS-licensed...

    this.iterator = iterator;
  }

  @Override
  public Iterator<E> iterator() {
    if (iterator == null) {
      // TODO: throw something else? Do we worry that people's code and tests
      // might be relying on this particular type of exception?
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }
    try {
      return iterator;
    } finally {
      iterator = null;
    }
  }

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A simplistic set which implements the bare minimum so that it can be used in tests without
 * relying on any specific Set implementations. Slow. Explicitly allows null elements so that they
 * can be used in the testers.
 *
 * @author Regina O'Dell
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A simplistic set which implements the bare minimum so that it can be used in tests without
 * relying on any specific Set implementations. Slow. Explicitly allows null elements so that they
 * can be used in the testers.
 *
 * @author Regina O'Dell
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked

        } catch (final Exception e) {
            fail("Initialize should not throw exception with valid annotation: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    // Test parameter validation without relying on complex configuration
    public void test_validateParameters_basic() {
        // Test that parameter validation can be performed
        final CustomSize validAnnotation = createBasicAnnotation();

        try {

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose map has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the map may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubmapSuite(
      FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder<
              ?, ? extends OneSizeTestContainerGenerator<Map<K, V>, Entry<K, V>>>
          parentBuilder,

   * the backport does. For now, we're keeping the class declaration in *both* flavors so that both
   * flavors can read old data or data from the other flavor. However, we strongly discourage
   * relying on this, as we have made incompatible changes to serialized forms in the past and
   * expect to do so again, as discussed in https://github.com/google/guava#important-warnings.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unused")