*
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public static final byte ESC = 27;

  /**
   * File Separator: These four information separators may be used within data in optional fashion,
   * except that their hierarchical relationship shall be: FS is the most inclusive, then GS, then
   * RS, and US is least inclusive. (The content and length of a File, Group, Record, or Unit are
   * not specified.)
   *
   * @since 8.0
   */

        "The SAM database on the Windows NT Server does not have a computer account for this workstation trust relationship.",
        "The logon request failed because the trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.",
        "The logon request failed because the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed.",

   *
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public static final byte ESC = 27;

  /**
   * File Separator: These four information separators may be used within data in optional fashion,
   * except that their hierarchical relationship shall be: FS is the most inclusive, then GS, then
   * RS, and US is least inclusive. (The content and length of a File, Group, Record, or Unit are
   * not specified.)
   *
   * @since 8.0
   */

     */
    // MAVENAPI FIXME: the DAG used is NOT only used to represent the dependency relation,
    // but also for <parent>, <build><plugin>, <reports>. We need multiple DAG's
    // since a DAG can only handle 1 type of relationship properly.
    // Use case:  This is detected as a cycle:
    // org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api                -(PARENT)->
    // org.apache.maven:maven                           -(inherited REPORTING)->

        "Logon failure: the user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer.",
        "The SAM database on the Windows NT Server does not have a computer account for this workstation trust relationship.",
        "The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed.",
        "The account used is a Computer Account. Use your global user account or local user account to access this server.",

 * comparator utilities, see either {@code Comparator} itself (for Java 8+), or {@code
 * com.google.common.collect.Ordering} (otherwise).
 *
 * <h3>Relationship to {@code Ordering}</h3>
 *
 * <p>In light of the significant enhancements to {@code Comparator} in Java 8, the overwhelming
 * majority of usages of {@code Ordering} can be written using only built-in JDK APIs. This class is

 * equivalent to hashing the {@code int} value {@code 0x04030201}. If this isn't what you need,
 * methods such as {@link Integer#reverseBytes} and {@link Ints#toByteArray} will help.
 *
 * <h3>Relationship to {@link Object#hashCode}</h3>
 *
 * <p>Java's baked-in concept of hash codes is constrained to 32 bits, and provides no separation

 * comparator utilities, see either {@code Comparator} itself (for Java 8+), or {@code
 * com.google.common.collect.Ordering} (otherwise).
 *
 * <h3>Relationship to {@code Ordering}</h3>
 *
 * <p>In light of the significant enhancements to {@code Comparator} in Java 8, the overwhelming
 * majority of usages of {@code Ordering} can be written using only built-in JDK APIs. This class is

                acquiredLock, this, previousDeadlockException.getConflictingStackTrace());
        policy.handlePotentialDeadlock(exception);
        return;
      }
      // Otherwise, it's the first time seeing this lock relationship. Look for
      // a path from the acquiredLock to this.
      Set<LockGraphNode> seen = Sets.newIdentityHashSet();
      ExampleStackTrace path = acquiredLock.findPathTo(this, seen);

      if (path == null) {

  //
  // ValueGraph identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link ValueGraph} that has the same elements and
   * the same structural relationships as those in this graph.
   *
   * <p>Thus, two value graphs A and B are equal if <b>all</b> of the following are true:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>A and B have equal {@link #isDirected() directedness}.