for (int repeats = 0; repeats < 10000; repeats++) {
      assertTrue(BloomFilter.optimalNumOfBits(random.nextInt(1 << 16), random.nextDouble()) >= 0);
    }

    // and some crazy values (this used to be capped to Integer.MAX_VALUE, now it can go bigger
    assertEquals(3327428144502L, BloomFilter.optimalNumOfBits(Integer.MAX_VALUE, Double.MIN_VALUE));
    IllegalArgumentException expected =
        assertThrows(

import java.io.File;

/**
 * Android-incompatible tests for {@link FileBackedOutputStream}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // Finalization probably just doesn't happen fast enough?
public class FileBackedOutputStreamAndroidIncompatibleTest extends IoTestCase {

  public void testFinalizeDeletesFile() throws Exception {
    byte[] data = newPreFilledByteArray(100);

  /**
   * Creates a new ArrayBasedUnicodeEscaper instance with the given replacement map and specified
   * safe range. If {@code safeMax < safeMin} then no code points are considered safe.
   *
   * <p>If a code point has no mapped replacement then it is checked against the safe range. If it
   * lies outside that, then {@link #escapeUnsafe} is called, otherwise no escaping is performed.
   *

 * #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even

                getKeyForNullValue(),
                v3(),
                (oldV, newV) -> {
                  throw new AssertionFailedError(
                      "Should not call merge function if key was mapped to null");
                }));
    expectReplacement(entry(getKeyForNullValue(), v3()));
  }

  @MapFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_PUT, ALLOWS_NULL_KEYS})
  public void testMergeAbsentNullKey() {
    assertEquals(

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.NavigableSet;
import java.util.SortedSet;
import java.util.TreeSet;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A wrapper around {@code TreeSet} that aggressively checks to see if elements are mutually
 * comparable. This implementation passes the navigable set test suites.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible

   * cached value, which will be recalculated when {@code get()} is called on the reserialized
   * instance. The actual memoization does not happen when the underlying delegate throws an
   * exception.
   *
   * <p>When the underlying delegate throws an exception then this memoizing supplier will keep
   * delegating calls until it returns valid data.
   *

import java.util.NavigableMap;
import java.util.NavigableSet;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.SortedMap;
import java.util.TreeMap;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A wrapper around {@code TreeMap} that aggressively checks to see if keys are mutually comparable.
 * This implementation passes the navigable map test suites.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible

import java.util.NavigableMap;
import java.util.NavigableSet;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.SortedMap;
import java.util.TreeMap;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A wrapper around {@code TreeMap} that aggressively checks to see if keys are mutually comparable.
 * This implementation passes the navigable map test suites.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible