import java.time.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * A Ticker whose value can be advanced programmatically in test.
 *
 * <p>The ticker can be configured so that the time is incremented whenever {@link #read} is called:
 * see {@link #setAutoIncrementStep}.
 *
 * <p>This class is thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Jige Yu

import java.time.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * A Ticker whose value can be advanced programmatically in test.
 *
 * <p>The ticker can be configured so that the time is incremented whenever {@link #read} is called:
 * see {@link #setAutoIncrementStep}.
 *
 * <p>This class is thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Jige Yu

    assertThat(leaf.certificate.sigAlgName).isEqualTo("SHA256WITHECDSA", ignoreCase = true)
  }

  @Test
  fun decodeEcdsa256() {
    // The certificate + private key below was generated programmatically:
    //
    // HeldCertificate heldCertificate = new HeldCertificate.Builder()
    //     .validityInterval(5_000L, 10_000L)
    //     .addSubjectAlternativeName("1.1.1.1")

   * given checked exception type. This reduces boilerplate for a common use of {@code Future} in
   * which it is unnecessary to programmatically distinguish between exception types or to extract
   * other information from the exception instance.
   *
   * <p>Exceptions from {@code Future.get} are treated as follows:
   *
   * <ul>

    enforce strict null checks.

 *  New: The response message is now non-null. This is the "Not Found" in the
    status line "HTTP 404 Not Found". If you are building responses
    programmatically (with `new Response.Builder()`) you must now always supply
    a message. An empty string `""` is permitted. This value was never null on
    responses returned by OkHttp itself, and it was an old mistake to permit

    From: [@mikedanese](https://github.com/mikedanese):
    Instead of aliasing. Aliases are annoying in a number of ways. This is
    specifically bugging me now because they make the action graph harder to
    analyze programmatically. By using aliases here, we would need to handle
    potentially aliased go_binary targets and dereference to the effective
    target.
  
    The comment references an issue with `pure = select(...)` which appears

    From: [@mikedanese](https://github.com/mikedanese):
    Instead of aliasing. Aliases are annoying in a number of ways. This is
    specifically bugging me now because they make the action graph harder to
    analyze programmatically. By using aliases here, we would need to handle
    potentially aliased go_binary targets and dereference to the effective
    target.
  
    The comment references an issue with `pure = select(...)` which appears

$font-weight-base;\n  line-height: $line-height-base;\n  color: $body-color;\n  text-align: left; // 3\n  background-color: $body-bg; // 2\n}\n\n// Future-proof rule: in browsers that support :focus-visible, suppress the focus outline\n// on elements that programmatically receive focus but wouldn't normally show a visible\n// focus outline. In general, this would mean that the outline is only applied if the\n// interaction that led to the element receiving programmatic focus was a keyboard interaction,\n// or...

$font-weight-base;\n  line-height: $line-height-base;\n  color: $body-color;\n  text-align: left; // 3\n  background-color: $body-bg; // 2\n}\n\n// Future-proof rule: in browsers that support :focus-visible, suppress the focus outline\n// on elements that programmatically receive focus but wouldn't normally show a visible\n// focus outline. In general, this would mean that the outline is only applied if the\n// interaction that led to the element receiving programmatic focus was a keyboard interaction,\n// or...