for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

  // Use fewer steps in the ListIteratorTester in ListListIteratorTester because it's slow in prod
  // mode.
  static int listListIteratorTesterNumIterations() {
    // TODO(hhchan): It's 4 in java.  Figure out why even 3 is too slow in prod mode.
    return 2;
  }

  // Use fewer steps in the IteratorTester in CollectionIteratorTester because it's slow in prod
  // mode.
  static int collectionIteratorTesterNumIterations() {
    return 3;
  }

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Ideally, get this to pass under Android. Failing that, convince ourselves
   * that the test isn't exposing a real problem with InterruptibleTask, one that could matter in
   * prod.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testInterruptIsSlow() throws Exception {
    final CountDownLatch isInterruptibleRegistered = new CountDownLatch(1);
    final SlowChannel slowChannel = new SlowChannel();

   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Ideally, get this to pass under Android. Failing that, convince ourselves
   * that the test isn't exposing a real problem with InterruptibleTask, one that could matter in
   * prod.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testInterruptIsSlow() throws Exception {
    final CountDownLatch isInterruptibleRegistered = new CountDownLatch(1);
    final SlowChannel slowChannel = new SlowChannel();

  private void setPredecessor(int entry, int pred) {
    long predMask = ~0L << 32;
    setLink(entry, (link(entry) & ~predMask) | ((long) (pred + 1) << 32));
  }

  private void setSucceeds(int pred, int succ) {
    if (pred == ENDPOINT) {
      firstEntry = succ;
    } else {
      setSuccessor(pred, succ);
    }

    if (succ == ENDPOINT) {
      lastEntry = pred;
    } else {

  }

  private void setPredecessor(int entry, int pred) {
    requirePredecessors()[entry] = pred + 1;
  }

  private void setSucceeds(int pred, int succ) {
    if (pred == ENDPOINT) {
      firstEntry = succ;
    } else {
      setSuccessor(pred, succ);
    }

    if (succ == ENDPOINT) {
      lastEntry = pred;
    } else {
      setPredecessor(succ, pred);
    }
  }

  @Override

  }

  private void setPredecessor(int entry, int pred) {
    requirePredecessors()[entry] = pred + 1;
  }

  private void setSucceeds(int pred, int succ) {
    if (pred == ENDPOINT) {
      firstEntry = succ;
    } else {
      setSuccessor(pred, succ);
    }

    if (succ == ENDPOINT) {
      lastEntry = pred;
    } else {
      setPredecessor(succ, pred);
    }
  }

  @Override