maven occur, the maven inheritance model must be pinned against a particular
  modelVersion. This is required so that a change from modelVersion 4.0.0 to
  4.1.0 doesn't cause compatibility problems with users who have not upgraded
  their projects. It also allows for a certain amount of legacy support into the
  future. Therefore, we should rename this file from pom.xml in the maven-core

 files for the current project. if yes. then I'm able to find projects that
 can be offered to be opened together with the current project.
 problems with the current solution are:
 1. information is duplicate. once in POM's dependencies and once in the
 maven.multiproject.includes property.
 2. it works without problems only for projects with relative paths, e.g., from
 one CVS repository.. for projects from multiple SCM repositories it's harder

that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free
software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we
want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so
that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original
authors' reputations.

Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents.
We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will

  file:// (which is highly likely to be the case), or the repository is
  not on a local filesystem, deployment will fail when offline.

** Testing mojos

  This can be a problem if the tests are more than simple unit tests;
  that is, if they require configuration of a server process, and
  subsequent testing in-container.

  Since we're only going to concern ourselves with states where localhost is

  traversing an object graph and extracting Object values, not just Strings.

* ComponentConfigurator

  Currently, the container uses BasicComponentConfigurator, to configure
  components. This wouldn't be a problem, except for the local instance of
  DefaultExpressionEvaluator used within. See the above discussion for more
  on why this evaluator is bad. We need to provide either an alternative