logger.warn("Failed to generate popular words.", e);
                }

                return wordList;
            });
        } catch (final ExecutionException e) {
            logger.warn("Failed to load popular words.", e);
        }
        return Collections.emptyList();
    }

    /**
     * Clears all cached popular word lists.
     */
    public void clearCache() {

  @JvmStatic // Despite being 'internal', this method is called by popular 3rd party SDKs.
  fun invalidatesCache(method: String): Boolean =
    (
      method == "POST" ||
        method == "PATCH" ||
        method == "PUT" ||
        method == "DELETE" ||
        method == "MOVE"
    )

  @JvmStatic // Despite being 'internal', this method is called by popular 3rd party SDKs.
  fun requiresRequestBody(method: String): Boolean =

### OAuth 1

Havia um OAuth 1, que é bem diferente do OAuth2, e mais complexo, isso incluía diretamente as especificações de como criptografar a comunicação.

Não é muito popular ou usado nos dias atuais.

OAuth2 não especifica como criptografar a comunicação, ele espera que você tenha sua aplicação em um servidor HTTPS.

/// tip | Dica

# Seed value for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.seed=0
# Tags for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.tags=
# Fields for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.fields=
# Excluded words for popular word suggestion.
suggest.popular.word.excludes=
# Number of popular words to suggest.
suggest.popular.word.size=10
# Window size for popular word suggestion.

### OAuth 1

Hubo un OAuth 1, que es muy diferente de OAuth2, y más complejo, ya que incluía especificaciones directas sobre cómo encriptar la comunicación.

No es muy popular o usado hoy en día.

OAuth2 no especifica cómo encriptar la comunicación, espera que tengas tu aplicación servida con HTTPS.

/// tip | Consejo

### OAuth 1

Es gab ein OAuth 1, das sich stark von OAuth2 unterscheidet und komplexer ist, da es direkte Spezifikationen enthält, wie die Kommunikation verschlüsselt wird.

Heutzutage ist es nicht sehr populär und wird kaum verwendet.

OAuth2 spezifiziert nicht, wie die Kommunikation verschlüsselt werden soll, sondern erwartet, dass Ihre Anwendung mit HTTPS bereitgestellt wird.

/// tip | Tipp

### OAuth 1 { #oauth-1 }

There was an OAuth 1, which is very different from OAuth2, and more complex, as it included direct specifications on how to encrypt the communication.

It is not very popular or used nowadays.

OAuth2 doesn't specify how to encrypt the communication, it expects you to have your application served with HTTPS.

/// tip

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test

/**
 * Jetty HTTP client.
 *
 * https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/http-client.html
 *
 * Baseline test if we ned to validate OkHttp behaviour against other popular clients.
 */
class JettyHttpClientTest {
  private val client = HttpClient()

  @StartStop
  private val server = MockWebServer()

  @BeforeEach fun setUp() {
    client.start()
  }

          $ref: '#/components/responses/InternalServerError'

  /popular-words:
    get:
      tags:
        - popularword
      summary: List popular words
      description: Returns available labels
      operationId: listPopularWords
      parameters:
        - name: seed
          in: query
          description: Random seed to return popular words
          required: false
          schema:

import org.junit.Assert
import org.junit.Test

/**
 * Simplified from
 * https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-5.0.x/httpclient5/examples/AsyncClientTlsAlpn.java
 *
 * Mainly intended to verify behaviour of popular clients across Android versions, similar
 * to observing Firefox or Chrome browser behaviour.
 */
class ApacheHttpClientHttp2Test {
  @Test
  fun testHttp2() {
    val client = HttpAsyncClients.createHttp2Default()