"CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"
                + " info=\\[futures=\\[SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING],"
                + " SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING]]]]");
    Integer integerPartial = 1;
    futureInteger.set(integerPartial);
    assertThat(futureResult.toString())
        .matches(
            "CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"

    @Override
    public void notifyNewValue(@CheckForNull V newValue) {
      if (newValue != null) {
        // The pending load was clobbered by a manual write.
        // Unblock all pending gets, and have them return the new value.
        set(newValue);
      } else {
        // The pending load was removed. Delay notifications until loading completes.
        oldValue = unset();
      }

      }

      message += "delay)";
    }
    // It's confusing to see a completed future in a timeout message; if isDone() returns false,
    // then we know it must have given a pending toString value earlier. If not, then the future
    // completed after the timeout expired, and the message might be success.
    if (isDone()) {

            "CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"
                + " info=\\[futures=\\[SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING],"
                + " SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING]]]]");
    Integer integerPartial = 1;
    futureInteger.set(integerPartial);
    assertThat(futureResult.toString())
        .matches(
            "CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"

   * tasks. Second, the returned list will always be empty, as any submitted task is considered to
   * have started execution. This applies also to tasks given to {@code invokeAll} or {@code
   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should

      InCompletionOrderState<T> localState = state;
      if (super.cancel(interruptIfRunning)) {
        /*
         * requireNonNull is generally safe: If cancel succeeded, then this Future was still
         * pending, so its `state` field hasn't been nulled out yet.
         *
         * OK, it's technically possible for this to fail in the presence of unsafe publishing, as

    @Override
    public void notifyNewValue(@CheckForNull V newValue) {
      if (newValue != null) {
        // The pending load was clobbered by a manual write.
        // Unblock all pending gets, and have them return the new value.
        set(newValue);
      } else {
        // The pending load was removed. Delay notifications until loading completes.
        oldValue = unset();
      }

    NodeVisitState state = visitedNodes.get(node);
    if (state == NodeVisitState.COMPLETE) {
      return false;
    }
    if (state == NodeVisitState.PENDING) {
      return true;
    }

    visitedNodes.put(node, NodeVisitState.PENDING);
    for (N nextNode : graph.successors(node)) {
      if (canTraverseWithoutReusingEdge(graph, nextNode, previousNode)