import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Locale;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Since annotations have some reusability issues that force copy and paste all over the place, it's
 * worth having a test to ensure that all our Feature enums have their annotations correctly set up.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
public class FeatureEnumTest extends TestCase {

 * @author Charles Fry
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public interface RemovalListener<K, V> {
  /**
   * Notifies the listener that a removal occurred at some point in the past.
   *
   * <p>This does not always signify that the key is now absent from the cache, as it may have
   * already been re-added.
   */
  // Technically should accept RemovalNotification<? extends K, ? extends V>, but because

      return label;
    }
  }

  /** Convenient subsets of the {@link Timeout} enumeration for specifying scenario outcomes. */
  private enum TimeoutsToUse {
    ANY(Timeout.values()),
    PAST(Timeout.MIN, Timeout.MINUS_SMALL, Timeout.ZERO),
    FUTURE(Timeout.SMALL, Timeout.MAX),
    SMALL(Timeout.SMALL),
    FINITE(Timeout.MIN, Timeout.MINUS_SMALL, Timeout.ZERO, Timeout.SMALL),

       *
       * - in the "reentrant submit" case of `execute` (in which case we must have started running a
       *   user task -- which means that we already got past this code (or else we exited early
       *   above))
       */
      // Unconditionally set; there is no risk of throwing away a queued task from another thread,

 * addressable domain on the web -- that is, for a candidate string {@code "xxx"}, might browsing to
 * {@code "http://xxx/"} result in a webpage being displayed? In the past, this test was frequently
 * done by determining whether the domain ended with a {@linkplain #isPublicSuffix() public suffix}
 * but was not itself a public suffix. However, this test is no longer accurate. There are many

   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid

            + "]"
            + "0189["
            + Character.MAX_CODE_POINT
            + "]";
    assertEquals(expected, escapeAsString(e, TEST_STRING));
  }

  public void testGrowBuffer() { // need to grow past an initial 1024 byte buffer
    StringBuilder input = new StringBuilder();
    StringBuilder expected = new StringBuilder();
    for (int i = 256; i < 1024; i++) {
      input.append((char) i);

  }

  /*
   * Note: All of this duplicate code sucks, but it saves a lot of memory. If only Java had mixins!
   * To maintain this code, make a change for the strong reference type. Then, cut and paste, and
   * replace "Strong" with "Soft" or "Weak" within the pasted text. The primary difference is that
   * strong entries store the key reference directly while soft and weak entries delegate to their

          throw new NoSuchElementException();
        }
        /*
         * requireNonNull is safe because our callers always pass non-null arguments. Each element
         * of the array becomes null only when we iterate past it and then clear it.
         */
        I result = requireNonNull(elements[index]);
        elements[index] = null;
        index++;
        return result;
      }
    };
  }

  /**

clock in a twinkling!  Half-past one, time for dinner!'

  (`I only wish it was,' the March Hare said to itself in a
whisper.)

  `That would be grand, certainly,' said Alice thoughtfully:
`but then--I shouldn't be hungry for it, you know.'

  `Not at first, perhaps,' said the Hatter:  `but you could keep
it to half-past one as long as you liked.'