assertTrue(Files.isRegularFile(file, NOFOLLOW_LINKS));

      MoreFiles.deleteRecursively(file);

      assertFalse(Files.exists(file, NOFOLLOW_LINKS));

      Path symlink = fs.getPath("/symlinktodir");
      assertTrue(Files.isSymbolicLink(symlink));

      Path realSymlinkTarget = symlink.toRealPath();
      assertTrue(Files.isDirectory(realSymlinkTarget, NOFOLLOW_LINKS));

 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.

   * SortedSet} values.
   */
  @Override
  public Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>Consequently, the values do not follow their natural ordering or the ordering of the value
   * comparator.
   */
  @Override
  public Collection<V> values() {
    return super.values();
  }

   * SortedSet} values.
   */
  @Override
  public Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>Consequently, the values do not follow their natural ordering or the ordering of the value
   * comparator.
   */
  @Override
  public Collection<V> values() {
    return super.values();
  }

   * Shift Out: A control character indicating that the code combinations which follow shall be
   * interpreted as outside of the character set of the standard code table until a Shift In
   * character is reached.
   *
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public static final byte SO = 14;

  /**
   * Shift In: A control character indicating that the code combinations which follow shall be
   * interpreted according to the standard code table.
   *

  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>The iterator generated by the returned collection traverses the values in the order they
   * were added to the multimap. Because the values may have duplicates and follow the insertion
   * ordering, this method returns a {@link List}, instead of the {@link Collection} specified in
   * the {@link ListMultimap} interface.
   */
  @Override
  public List<V> values() {

      return false;
    }

    @Override
    Entry<K, V> forEntry(int entry) {
      return new EntryForKey(entry);
    }
  }

  /**
   * An {@code Entry} implementation that attempts to follow its key around the map -- that is, if
   * the key is moved, deleted, or reinserted, it will account for that -- while not doing any extra
   * work if the key has not moved. One quirk: The {@link #getValue()} method can return {@code

   * immediately accessed at the stable (maximum) rate.
   *
   * <p>The returned {@code RateLimiter} starts in a "cold" state (i.e. the warmup period will
   * follow), and if it is left unused for long enough, it will return to that state.
   *
   * @param permitsPerSecond the rate of the returned {@code RateLimiter}, measured in how many
   *     permits become available per second

import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Implementation of {@code Multimap} that does not allow duplicate key-value entries and that
 * returns collections whose iterators follow the ordering in which the data was added to the
 * multimap.
 *
 * <p>The collections returned by {@code keySet}, {@code keys}, and {@code asMap} iterate through

      if (mappings.containsKey(var)) {
        // Mapping already established
        // This is possible when following both superClass -> enclosingClass
        // and enclosingclass -> superClass paths.
        // Since we follow the path of superclass first, enclosing second,
        // superclass mapping should take precedence.
        return;
      }
      // First, check whether var -> arg forms a cycle