A result(Collector<T, A, R> collector, Iterable<T> inputs) {
        List<A> stack = new ArrayList<>();
        for (T input : inputs) {
          A newAccum = collector.supplier().get();
          collector.accumulator().accept(newAccum, input);
          push(stack, newAccum);
        }
        push(stack, collector.supplier().get());

  private static void assertMacHashing(
      byte[] input, String algorithm, SecretKey key, HashFunction hashFunc) throws Exception {
    Mac mac = Mac.getInstance(algorithm);
    mac.init(key);
    mac.update(input);

    assertEquals(HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal()), hashFunc.hashBytes(input));
    assertEquals(HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal(input)), hashFunc.hashBytes(input));
  }

  @SafeVarargs
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Iterable<T> concat(Iterable<? extends T>... inputs) {
    return FluentIterable.concat(inputs);
  }

  /**
   * Combines multiple iterables into a single iterable. The returned iterable has an iterator that
   * traverses the elements of each iterable in {@code inputs}. The input iterators are not polled
   * until necessary.
   *

    /*
     * TODO: cpovirk - Pre-size the HashMap based on the number of enum values? (But *not* based on
     * the number of entries in the map, as that makes it easy for hostile inputs to trigger lots of
     * allocation—not that any program should be deserializing hostile inputs to begin with!)
     */
    setDelegates(new EnumMap<K, V>(keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl), new HashMap<V, K>());
    Serialization.populateMap(this, stream);
  }

  private static void testReverse(float[] input, float[] expectedOutput) {
    input = Arrays.copyOf(input, input.length);
    Floats.reverse(input);
    assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  private static void testReverse(
      float[] input, int fromIndex, int toIndex, float[] expectedOutput) {
    input = Arrays.copyOf(input, input.length);
    Floats.reverse(input, fromIndex, toIndex);

     *
     * Unfortunately, we don't distinguish between these two cases in our public API: Joiner.on(...)
     * and Joiner.on(...).useForNull(...) both declare the same return type: plain Joiner. To ensure
     * that users *can* pass null arguments to Joiner, we annotate it as if it always tolerates null
     * inputs, rather than as if it never tolerates them.
     *

   * consistent hashing</a> for more information.
   */
  public static int consistentHash(long input, int buckets) {
    checkArgument(buckets > 0, "buckets must be positive: %s", buckets);
    LinearCongruentialGenerator generator = new LinearCongruentialGenerator(input);
    int candidate = 0;
    int next;

    // Jump from bucket to bucket until we go out of range
    while (true) {

   *
   * <p>This test might fail in GWT because the GWT emulations might count on the input collection
   * not to change during the copy. It is safe to do so in GWT because javascript is
   * single-threaded.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // GWT is single threaded
  public void testCopyOf_threadSafe() {
    /*
     * The actual collections that we pass as inputs will be wrappers around these, so

   *
   * <p>This test might fail in GWT because the GWT emulations might count on the input collection
   * not to change during the copy. It is safe to do so in GWT because javascript is
   * single-threaded.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // GWT is single threaded
  public void testCopyOf_threadSafe() {
    /*
     * The actual collections that we pass as inputs will be wrappers around these, so

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code Collector} that accumulates elements into an {@code ImmutableMultiset} whose
   * elements are the result of applying {@code elementFunction} to the inputs, with counts equal to
   * the result of applying {@code countFunction} to the inputs.
   *
   * <p>If the mapped elements contain duplicates (according to {@link Object#equals}), the first