int h2 = Objects.hashCode(Integer.valueOf(1), new String("two"), Double.valueOf(3.0));
    // repeatable
    assertEquals(h1, h2);

    // These don't strictly need to be true, but they're nice properties.
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, 2));
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, null, 2));
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, null, 2) != Objects.hashCode(1, 2));

  public void testPutAllNullValueSingle_unsupported() {
    multimap().putAll(k1(), Lists.newArrayList((V) null));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  // In principle, it would be nice to apply these two tests to keys with existing values, too.

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testPutAllNullValueNullLast_unsupported() {
    int size = getNumElements();

   * `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`
   * gets translated back to `Integer.valueOf` because that is the only thing J2KT can support. And
   * anyway, it's nice to avoid `Integer.valueOf` because the Android toolchain optimizes multiple
   * `Integer.valueOf` calls into one! So we stick with the deprecated `Integer` constructor.
   */

  public void testEqualsEquivalent() {

  public void testPutAllNullValueSingle_unsupported() {
    multimap().putAll(k1(), Lists.newArrayList((V) null));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  // In principle, it would be nice to apply these two tests to keys with existing values, too.

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testPutAllNullValueNullLast_unsupported() {
    int size = getNumElements();

    int h2 = Objects.hashCode(Integer.valueOf(1), new String("two"), Double.valueOf(3.0));
    // repeatable
    assertEquals(h1, h2);

    // These don't strictly need to be true, but they're nice properties.
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, 2));
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, null, 2));
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, null, 2) != Objects.hashCode(1, 2));

   *     the size method
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Collection<T> misleadingSizeCollection(int delta) {
    // It would be nice to be able to return a real concurrent
    // collection like ConcurrentLinkedQueue, so that e.g. concurrent
    // iteration would work, but that would not be GWT-compatible.

    Collections.shuffle(hashCodes);
    HashCode hashCode2 = Hashing.combineUnordered(hashCodes);

    assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
  }

  // This isn't specified by contract, but it'll still be nice to know if this behavior changes.
  public void testConcatenating_equals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(Hashing.concatenating(asList(Hashing.md5())))

       * need to clear our reference to the TimeoutFuture is the reason we use a *static* nested
       * class with a manual reference back to the "containing" class.)
       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since

flavor.

-   Snapshot API Docs: [guava][guava-snapshot-api-docs]
-   Snapshot API Diffs: [guava][guava-snapshot-api-diffs]

## Learn about Guava

-   Our users' guide, [Guava Explained]
-   [A nice collection](https://www.tfnico.com/presentations/google-guava) of
    other helpful links

## Links

-   [GitHub project](https://github.com/google/guava)

            .withTearDown(parentBuilder.getTearDown())
            .createTestSuite());
    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): the Map tests duplicate most of this effort by using a
     * CollectionTestSuiteBuilder on values(). It would be nice to avoid that
     */
    derived.add(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new BiMapValueSetGenerator<K, V>(parentBuilder.getSubjectGenerator()))