* `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`
   * gets translated back to `Integer.valueOf` because that is the only thing J2KT can support. And
   * anyway, it's nice to avoid `Integer.valueOf` because the Android toolchain optimizes multiple
   * `Integer.valueOf` calls into one! So we stick with the deprecated `Integer` constructor.
   */

  public void testEqualsEquivalent() {

    int h2 = Objects.hashCode(Integer.valueOf(1), new String("two"), Double.valueOf(3.0));
    // repeatable
    assertEquals(h1, h2);

    // These don't strictly need to be true, but they're nice properties.
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, 2));
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, null, 2));
    assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, null, 2) != Objects.hashCode(1, 2));

  public void testPutAllNullValueSingle_unsupported() {
    multimap().putAll(k1(), Lists.newArrayList((V) null));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  // In principle, it would be nice to apply these two tests to keys with existing values, too.

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testPutAllNullValueNullLast_unsupported() {
    int size = getNumElements();

       * need to clear our reference to the TimeoutFuture is the reason we use a *static* nested
       * class with a manual reference back to the "containing" class.)
       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since

            .withTearDown(parentBuilder.getTearDown())
            .createTestSuite());
    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): the Map tests duplicate most of this effort by using a
     * CollectionTestSuiteBuilder on values(). It would be nice to avoid that
     */
    derived.add(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new BiMapValueSetGenerator<K, V>(parentBuilder.getSubjectGenerator()))

       *
       * TODO(cpovirk): It might be nice for our InterruptibleTask subclasses to null out their
       *  `callable` fields automatically. That would make it less important for us to null out the
       * reference to `task` here (though it's still nice to do so in case our reference to the

              @Override
              protected SortedMap<String, String> create(Entry<String, String>[] entries) {
                /*
                 * TODO(cpovirk): it would be nice to create an input Map and use
                 * the copy constructor here and in the other tests
                 */
                return populate(new TreeMap<String, String>(), entries);
              }

  /** Returns the sample elements that this generate populates its container with. */
  SampleElements<E> samples();

  /**
   * Creates a new container containing the given elements. TODO: would be nice to figure out how to
   * use E... or E[] as a parameter type, but this doesn't seem to work because Java creates an
   * array of the erased type.
   */
  T create(Object... elements);

  /**

  /** Returns the sample elements that this generate populates its container with. */
  SampleElements<E> samples();

  /**
   * Creates a new container containing the given elements. TODO: would be nice to figure out how to
   * use E... or E[] as a parameter type, but this doesn't seem to work because Java creates an
   * array of the erased type.
   */
  T create(Object... elements);

  /**

   *     the size method
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Collection<T> misleadingSizeCollection(int delta) {
    // It would be nice to be able to return a real concurrent
    // collection like ConcurrentLinkedQueue, so that e.g. concurrent
    // iteration would work, but that would not be GWT-compatible.