* </p>
 * <p>
 * Wise voices have suggested that maybe aggregators shouldn't be bound to the ordinary
 * lifecycle at all, in which case we wouldn't be needing this class at all ( and
 * ProjectBuildList.getByTaskSegments). Or maybe they should be introduced in the calculation
 * of the execution plan instead, which seems much nicer.
 * </p>
 * <p>

used to test the individual components in the lifecycle with data that has expected characteristics
and can be asserted as desired.

You can change/extend these stubs, and tests should not be breaking too much, since most tests
assert using expected values from the stubs. Normally, when you try to use data from the stubs that
have not been properly populated, you'll get a nullpointer in your test and you then have to

  All of these operations will produce their own unique errors in the absence of
  a coordinated offline strategy. In addition, efforts to unite these failing
  behaviors behind a consistent user interface is much, much more difficult if
  the system can't tell whether it has access to the network required by these
  operations.

  Offline mode really means anticipating a lack of network connectivity, and as

        MavenExecutionPlan plan = LifecycleExecutionPlanCalculatorStub.getProjectAExecutionPlan();

        assertNull(plan.findLastInPhase("pacXkage"));
        // Beer comes straight after package in stub, much like real life.
        assertNotNull(plan.findLastInPhase(LifecycleExecutionPlanCalculatorStub.INITIALIZE.getPhase()));
    }

</dependencies>
    ]]></configuration>
    <description>
      <![CDATA[
      This is a set of Artifact instances resolved from the set of dependencies for
      the current project.

      NOTE: This will likely contain much more than the direct dependencies of the
      current POM, since Maven uses transitive, or chained, dependency resolution.
    ]]></description>
  </expression>
  <expression>
    <syntax>project.parentArtifact</syntax>

      use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
      where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
      by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a

                    + " because they threaten the stability of your build.");
            LOGGER.warn("");
            LOGGER.warn("For this reason, future Maven versions might no"
                    + " longer support building such malformed projects.");
            LOGGER.warn("");
        }

        return projects;
    }

     * creator of the problem, the general expectation is that the hint provides sufficient information to the user to
     * track the problem back to its origin. A concrete example for such a source hint can be the file path or URL from
     * which the settings were read.
     *
     * @return the hint about the source of the problem or an empty string if unknown, never {@code null}
     */
    @Nonnull

         * unique within a single POM. Upon multiple declarations, 2.x just kept the last one but retained the order of
         * the first occurrence. So when we're in lenient/compat mode, we have to deal with such broken POMs and mimic
         * the way 2.x works. When we're in strict mode, the removal of duplicates just saves other merging steps from
         * aftereffects and bogus error messages.
         */

            of the {@code ${os.name}} Java property, such as {@code Windows XP}.
          </description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>family</name>
          <version>4.0.0+</version>
          <type>String</type>
          <description>
            The general family of the OS to be used to activate the profile, such as
            {@code windows} or {@code unix}.