validations:
    required: true
- type: textarea
  attributes:
    label: Rationale
    description: |
      Why is the counter important?
      For example, what new insights will it provide, and how will that information be used?
      If this is about updating existing counters, why is the change necessary?
  validations:
    required: true
- type: textarea
  attributes:

        - label: "Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?"
        - label: "Does this affect error handling?"
        - label: "Is this about generics?"
        - label: "Is this change backward compatible? Breaking the Go 1 compatibility guarantee is a large cost and requires a large benefit"

  - type: textarea
    id: related-proposals
    attributes:
      label: Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?

        Requesting we remove a module here only hides the generated documentation on pkg.go.dev.
        It does not affect the behaviour of proxy.golang.org or the go command.
        Instead we recommend using the retract directive which will be processed by all 3 of the above.

        If you have deleted your repo, please recreate it and publish a retraction.

// Copyright 2021 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

// Test to make sure that if we use R15 after it is clobbered by
// a global variable access while dynamic linking, we get an error.
// See issue 43661.

TEXT ·a1(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	MOVL $0, R15
	RET
TEXT ·a2(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0

    attributes:
      label: "What did you see happen?"
      description: Command invocations and their associated output, functions with their arguments and return results, full stacktraces for panics (upload a file if it is very long), etc. Prefer copying text output over using screenshots.
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: expected-behavior
    attributes:
      label: "What did you expect to see?"

	SHLL	CX, foo+4(SB)
	// Old syntax, still accepted:
	SHLL	CX, R11:AX // SHLL CX, AX, R11

// LTYPEM spec6	{ outcode($1, &$2); }
	MOVL	AX, R11
	MOVL	$4, R11
//	MOVL	AX, 0(AX):DS // no longer works - did it ever?

// LTYPEI spec7	{ outcode($1, &$2); }
	IMULB	DX
	IMULW	DX, BX
	IMULL	R11, R12
	IMULQ	foo+4(SB), R11

// LTYPEXC spec8	{ outcode($1, &$2); }
	CMPPD	X1, X2, 4
	CMPPD	foo+4(SB), X2, 4