* rate at the end of the period (as long as there are enough requests to saturate it). Similarly,
   * if the {@code RateLimiter} is left <i>unused</i> for a duration of {@code warmupPeriod}, it
   * will gradually return to its "cold" state, i.e. it will go through the same warming up process
   * as when it was first created.
   *

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will

   *
   * @since 19.0
   */
  public static final class UnsupportedLoadingOperationException
      extends UnsupportedOperationException {
    // Package-private because this should only be thrown by loadAll() when it is not overridden.
    // Cache implementors may want to catch it but should not need to be able to throw it.
    UnsupportedLoadingOperationException() {}

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Closes the given {@link InputStream}, logging any {@code IOException} that's thrown rather than
   * propagating it.
   *
   * <p>While it's not safe in the general case to ignore exceptions that are thrown when closing an
   * I/O resource, it should generally be safe in the case of a resource that's being used only for

            task = null;
          }
        }
      } finally {
        // Ensure that if the thread was interrupted at all while processing the task queue, it
        // is returned to the delegate Executor interrupted so that it may handle the
        // interruption if it likes.
        if (interruptedDuringTask) {
          Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
        }
      }
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("GuardedBy")

      Iterable<? extends T> iterable, Comparator<T> comparator) {
    checkNotNull(comparator);
    Iterator<? extends T> it = iterable.iterator();
    if (it.hasNext()) {
      T prev = it.next();
      while (it.hasNext()) {
        T next = it.next();
        if (comparator.compare(prev, next) >= 0) {
          return false;
        }
        prev = next;
      }
    }

    propagateIfInstanceOf(throwable, declaredType1);
    propagateIfPossible(throwable, declaredType2);
  }

  /**
   * Propagates {@code throwable} as-is if it is an instance of {@link RuntimeException} or {@link
   * Error}, or else as a last resort, wraps it in a {@code RuntimeException} and then propagates.
   *
   * <p>This method always throws an exception. The {@code RuntimeException} return type allows

    propagateIfInstanceOf(throwable, declaredType1);
    propagateIfPossible(throwable, declaredType2);
  }

  /**
   * Propagates {@code throwable} as-is if it is an instance of {@link RuntimeException} or {@link
   * Error}, or else as a last resort, wraps it in a {@code RuntimeException} and then propagates.
   *
   * <p>This method always throws an exception. The {@code RuntimeException} return type allows

     * it returns a subclass of Joiner that overrides this method to tolerate null inputs.
     *
     * Unfortunately, we don't distinguish between these two cases in our public API: Joiner.on(...)
     * and Joiner.on(...).useForNull(...) both declare the same return type: plain Joiner. To ensure
     * that users *can* pass null arguments to Joiner, we annotate it as if it always tolerates null

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *