assertTrue(a.getScope().equals("test"), "Incorrect scope for " + a.getDependencyConflictId());

        // transitive dep, overridden b depMgmt
        assertTrue(b.getScope().equals("runtime"), "Incorrect scope for " + b.getDependencyConflictId());

        // direct dep, overrides depMgmt
        assertTrue(c.getScope().equals("runtime"), "Incorrect scope for " + c.getDependencyConflictId());
    }

        assertFalse(greater.equals(t));
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns a collection that simulates concurrent modification by having its size method return
   * incorrect values. This is useful for testing methods that must treat the return value from
   * size() as a hint only.
   *
   * @param delta the difference between the true size of the collection and the values returned by

      // 'actualLastElement' is now at 'lastElementAt', and the element that was at 'lastElementAt'
      // is now at the end of queue. If that's the element we wanted to remove in the first place,
      // don't try to (incorrectly) trickle it. Instead, just delete it and we're done.
      queue[size] = null;
      return null;
    }
    E toTrickle = elementData(size);
    queue[size] = null;

    public static final String ERRORS_could_not_find_backup_index = "{errors.could_not_find_backup_index}";

    /** The key of the message: The current password is incorrect. */
    public static final String ERRORS_no_user_for_changing_password = "{errors.no_user_for_changing_password}";

    /** The key of the message: Failed to change your password. */

    }

    @Test
    void testDependencyScope() throws Exception {
        buildPom("dependency-scope/sub");
    }

    // This will fail on a validation error if incorrect
    public void testDependencyManagementWithInterpolation() throws Exception {
        buildPom("dependency-management-with-interpolation/sub");
    }

    @Test

                    + " Scope: " + artifact.getScope());
            assertTrue(
                    artifact.getVersion().equals("1.0"), "Incorrect version for " + artifact.getDependencyConflictId());
        }
    }

                    + " Optional=" + (artifact.isOptional() ? "true" : "false"));
            assertTrue(
                    artifact.getVersion().equals("1.0"), "Incorrect version for " + artifact.getDependencyConflictId());
        }
    }

   *
   * <p>The C++ equivalent is the MurmurHash3_x86_32 function (Murmur3A), which however does not
   * have the bug.
   *
   * @deprecated This implementation produces incorrect hash values from the {@link
   *     HashFunction#hashString} method if the string contains non-BMP characters. Use {@link
   *     #murmur3_32_fixed(int)} instead.
   */
  @Deprecated

    try {
      Sets.subSet(set, Range.closed(4, 8));
      fail("IllegalArgumentException expected");
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }

    // These results are all incorrect, but there's no way (short of iterating over the result)
    // to verify that with an arbitrary ordering or comparator.
    assertEquals(ImmutableSortedSet.of(2, 4), Sets.subSet(set, Range.atLeast(4)));

                    + " Optional=" + (artifact.isOptional() ? "true" : "false"));
            assertTrue(
                    artifact.getVersion().equals("1.0"), "Incorrect version for " + artifact.getDependencyConflictId());
        }
    }