id: what-did-you-do
    attributes:
      label: "What did you do?"
      description: "If possible, provide a recipe for reproducing the error. A complete runnable program is good. A link on [go.dev/play](https://go.dev/play) is best."
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: actual-behavior
    attributes:
      label: "What did you see happen?"
    validations:
      required: true

#include "../../../../../runtime/textflag.h"
// TODO: cover more instruction

TEXT foo(SB),DUPOK|NOSPLIT,$0
	JAL	1(PC)	//CALL 1(PC)	//00040054
	JAL	(R4)	//CALL (R4)	//8100004c
	// relocation in play so the assembled offset should be 0

pkg go/doc, const AllDecls = 1
pkg go/doc, const AllMethods = 2
pkg go/doc, type Example struct, EmptyOutput bool
pkg go/doc, type Example struct, Order int
pkg go/doc, type Example struct, Play *ast.File
pkg go/doc, type Note struct
pkg go/doc, type Note struct, Body string
pkg go/doc, type Note struct, End token.Pos
pkg go/doc, type Note struct, Pos token.Pos
pkg go/doc, type Note struct, UID string

    id: what-did-you-do
    attributes:
      label: "What did you do?"
      description: "If possible, provide a recipe for reproducing the error. A complete runnable program is good. A link on [go.dev/play](https://go.dev/play) is better. A failing unit test is the best."
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: actual-behavior
    attributes:
      label: "What did you see happen?"
    validations:

    id: what-did-you-do
    attributes:
      label: "What did you do?"
      description: "If possible, provide a recipe for reproducing the error. A complete runnable program is good. A link on [go.dev/play](https://go.dev/play) is best."
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: actual-behavior
    attributes:
      label: "What did you see happen?"

TEXT asmtest(SB),DUPOK|NOSPLIT,$0
lable1:
	BFPT	1(PC)			// 00050048
	BFPT	lable1	// BFPT 2	//1ffdff4b

lable2:
	BFPF	1(PC)			// 00040048
	BFPF	lable2	// BFPF 4 	// 1ffcff4b

	// relocation in play so the assembled offset should be 0
	JMP	foo(SB)			// 00000050

	JMP	(R4)			// 8000004c
	JMP	1(PC)			// 00040050
	MOVW	$65536, R4		// 04020014
	MOVW	$4096, R4		// 24000014
	MOVV	$65536, R4		// 04020014

but only worthwhile if it's likely the instruction will be used again.
Instead, for simple one-off cases, it's possible to use the <code>BYTE</code>
and <code>WORD</code> directives
to lay down explicit data into the instruction stream within a <code>TEXT</code>.
Here's how the 386 runtime defines the 64-bit atomic load function.
</p>

<pre>
// uint64 atomicload64(uint64 volatile* addr);

    described in the proposal continues to work in the same way it did in Go 1.21.
  </li>
  <li>
    "For" loops may now range over integers.
    For <a href="https://go.dev/play/p/ky02zZxgk_r?v=gotip">example</a>:
<pre>
package main

import "fmt"

func main() {
  for i := range 10 {
    fmt.Println(10 - i)
  }
  fmt.Println("go1.22 has lift-off!")
}
</pre>