testers.add(ListSubListTester.class);
    testers.add(ListToArrayTester.class);
    return testers;
  }

  /**
   * Specifies {@link CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER} for all list tests, since lists have an
   * iteration ordering corresponding to the insertion order.
   */
  @Override
  public TestSuite createTestSuite() {
    withFeatures(KNOWN_ORDER);
    return super.createTestSuite();
  }

  @Override

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
                  public Map<TypeToken, Object> create(Object... elements) {

    checkNotNull(executor, "Executor was null.");

    // Lock while we check state. We must maintain the lock while adding the new pair so that
    // another thread can't run the list out from under us. We only add to the list if we have not
    // yet started execution.
    synchronized (this) {
      if (!executed) {
        runnables = new RunnableExecutorPair(runnable, executor, runnables);
        return;
      }
    }

   * documentation for {@link Collection}:
   *
   * <blockquote>
   *
   * "Some collection implementations have restrictions on the elements that they may contain. For
   * example, some implementations prohibit null elements, and some have restrictions on the types
   * of their elements."
   *
   * </blockquote>
   */
  RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,

  /**

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (That would also have ensured that its cause was always an Error, rather than possibly another

        assertThat(network.removeNode(nodeList.get(i))).isTrue();
      }

      assertThat(network.nodes()).hasSize(NUM_NODES - numNodesToRemove);
      // Number of edges remaining is unknown (node's incident edges have been removed).
      AbstractNetworkTest.validateNetwork(network);

      for (int i = numNodesToRemove; i < NUM_NODES; ++i) {
        assertThat(network.removeNode(nodeList.get(i))).isTrue();
      }

        : SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(keySetGenerator);
  }

  /**
   * To avoid infinite recursion, test suites with these marker features won't have derived suites
   * created for them.
   */
  enum NoRecurse implements Feature<@Nullable Void> {
    SUBMAP,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override
    public Set<Feature<? super @Nullable Void>> getImpliedFeatures() {

   * documentation for {@link Collection}:
   *
   * <blockquote>
   *
   * "Some collection implementations have restrictions on the elements that they may contain. For
   * example, some implementations prohibit null elements, and some have restrictions on the types
   * of their elements."
   *
   * </blockquote>
   */
  RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,

  /**

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
                  public Map<TypeToken, Object> create(Object... elements) {

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
                  public Map<TypeToken, Object> create(Object... elements) {